This article that recently ran in the Oregonian, is one Oregon man's vision of a plan that could bring about much needed change to the war in Iraq.
(PORTLAND, Ore.) - Conservatives know we must send a strong message to the insurgents that the United States will not quit until success is achieved. Liberals know such a message encourages the Iraqi government to play the slacker.
Both are correct.
How does the United States create a compelling motivation for the Iraqis while simultaneously demonstrating U.S. fortitude and endurance? Answer: Transfer Baghdad to Iraqi security soon.
The rest of Iraq would be left in the care of the United States. Set the date now. This will create a potent motivation for the Iraqi government to assume its responsibilities.
They will have to stand up, take charge and stop the violence -- out of sheer self-preservation. Sink or swim.
After Baghdad, transfer the remaining towns one by one. The Baghdad transfer would start a process that will eventually achieve stability, force a rough but acceptable ending and get the United States out of harm's way.
The transfer also would operate in a second way, as an ultimatum, as a powerful threat. Get going or the U.S. will set the transfer date.
Indeed, the more draconian, scary or coercive the transfer seems, the greater motivational weight it would carry.
----------------------------------------------------
Editor's Note: This is an introduction to a more comprehensive article by James Whinston that will be featured in the coming days here on Salem-News.com. The expanded article explains why his theory would work in Iraq and how this approach best fits the needs of a multitude of interests. He says it is the best answer for a resolution that addresses the real needs of the situation in Iraq.
Put the Iraqis in ChargeSalem-News.com