Sunday December 1, 2024
| |||
SNc Channels: HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe Search About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News. Publisher: Bonnie King CONTACT: Newsroom@Salem-news.com Advertising: Adsales@Salem-news.com ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
Apr-06-2008 11:30TweetFollow @OregonNews Op-Ed: Asking The Right Business Questions About High Gas PricesBy Charles Cresson Wood, Special to Salem-News.comIt is time for organizations to seriously consider the impacts of continuing to use petroleum fuels when their competitors are starting to convert to alternative fuels.
(SAUSALITO, Calif.) - The notion of "peak oil" -- which holds that the world's production of oil is at it's all-time high this year, or within a few years -- has recently become credible in the business community. While most everybody will agree that petroleum is a depleting resource with a limited supply, the question many now wrestle with is: "How much more oil is there left in the ground?" Considerable debate wages about the real level of petroleum reserves, and how many more years it will last. Unfortunately this discussion is a distraction from the practical questions that business managers should be asking. A much better question to ask would be: "How much longer will it be before our organization starts to suffer serious adverse impacts because the world supply of oil is dwindling?" When I make reference to serious adverse impacts, I am talking about, among other things, rapidly escalating costs associated with petroleum fuels, and fuel shortages occasioned by geo-political events such as resource wars and embargoes. While there is unquestionably plenty of oil left in the world, that doesn't mean it will be worthwhile for anyone to extract and refine that oil. At the same time, supplies in many of the world's major oil fields -- such as the Cantarell oil field in Mexico -- are now rapidly depleting, and as a result, these fields are no longer producing at the rates formerly observed. Another more revealing question to ask would be: "Even if we are able to find more oil, will it be worthwhile for us to extract, transport, and refine that oil into gasoline, diesel fuel, and other sources of energy?" A lot of the oil being discovered these days is considerably less desirable than the light sweet crude that used to be widely pumped out of the ground. In other words, the easy-to-reach most-easily-processed oil is in increasingly short supply. A great deal of the oil now being extracted from the ground is "heavy oil" which is more difficult and more expensive to refine. The tar sands in Canada provide a good example of this difficult-to-handle oil. There comes a point where the energy obtained from these efforts is only equal to the energy expended in order to get this new energy. At this point, we will stop extracting the oil from the ground because it no longer makes sense to do so. This is a physics question, not a geological question about how much oil remains in the ground. The point where we stop extracting oil is going to be reached much sooner than the time when all oil supplies have been extracted. It is time for organizations to seriously consider the impacts of continuing to use petroleum fuels when their competitors are starting to convert to alternative fuels. These impacts include the inability to make timely deliveries to customers, the loss of an image that the organization is environmentally progressive and community-minded, the inability to meet government mandates for the use of alternative energy technologies, being forced to go to the black market in order to get petroleum-based fuels, having profits and budgets which are at the mercy of increasingly volatile petroleum prices, having to pay much higher carbon taxes, being at the mercy of geo-political and ethnic disputes over which the organization has no control, and being distracted by the problematic petroleum situation rather than attending to the important business issues. So if management at your organization has not yet started to seriously consider how the rapidly changing petroleum situation will impact the organization's future, it is paramount that they begin this process in the very near future. Charles Cresson Wood is an alternative fuels management consultant based in Sausalito, California. His latest book is called "Kicking The Gasoline & Petro-Diesel Habit: A Business Manager's Blueprint For Action." You can reach him via kickingthegasoline.com. Articles for April 5, 2008 | Articles for April 6, 2008 | Articles for April 7, 2008 | Support Salem-News.com: Quick Links
DININGWillamette UniversityGoudy Commons Cafe Dine on the Queen Willamette Queen Sternwheeler MUST SEE SALEMOregon Capitol ToursCapitol History Gateway Willamette River Ride Willamette Queen Sternwheeler Historic Home Tours: Deepwood Museum The Bush House Gaiety Hollow Garden AUCTIONS - APPRAISALSAuction Masters & AppraisalsCONSTRUCTION SERVICESRoofing and ContractingSheridan, Ore. ONLINE SHOPPINGSpecial Occasion DressesAdvertise with Salem-NewsContact:AdSales@Salem-News.com | |
Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2024 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.
Energy Realist April 7, 2008 10:18 am (Pacific time)
Cambridge Energy Research Associates is a cornucopist organization which has incorrectly predicted oil prices for years: Feb02: 02 oil $20 reality $26 Feb03: low to mid $20 reality $31 Feb04: upper $20 to low $20 thru 05 reality $65 Jun05: below $40 in 07 reality $100 Jun07: drop to low $60 reality $82 and beyond Aug07: 08 prices will be in mid-$60 reality: ? ... Oil shale is not oil.
oil producer April 6, 2008 7:27 pm (Pacific time)
Production has peaked May 2005. Most of all of the easy to get sweet crude oil is going bye bye. Yes there is oil in oil shale and tar sands, BUT what are you willing to pay to extract it and what would you be willing to pay for it? Peak oil is here and right now is the good old days for cheap oil.
Energy Optimist April 6, 2008 1:42 pm (Pacific time)
World oil production will not begin to fall for at least another 24 years, contrary to doomsday theories that supply is already in terminal decline, a prominent energy consulting group. Cambridge Energy Research Associates said in a report that the world has some 3.74 trillion barrels of oil left -- enough to last 122 years at current consumption rates and triple the amount estimated by “peak oil” theorists. The world consumes nearly 85 million barrels of oil per day, with the United States using about a quarter of that, according to the Department of Energy. Note: A cheap process has been developed to extract oil from shale. The United States has the largest supply of shale in the world, literally trillions of barrels could be extracted. Google shale oil processes and look for yourself!
PO April 6, 2008 1:34 pm (Pacific time)
The US was a creditor nation until the early 70's and has since been a debtor nation. Funny how it aligns with the peaking of our oil production. Now with other oil exporting nations beginning to peak one wonders what will happen
[Return to Top]©2024 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.