|
Wednesday May 23, 2012
| |||
|
SNc Channels: Search About
Salem-News.com is the premiere Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States. Salem-News.com is setting the standard for the future of news. ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
Apr-26-2010 14:58 ![]()
Justice Breyer but not Justice Thomas?Chuck Palazzo Salem-News.comI remind all of us that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, a former corporate attorney for Monsanto has not recused himself from this case.
(DA NANG, Vietnam) - The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments Tuesday regarding a federal judge's temporary ban on a breed of pesticide-resistant alfalfa, setting the stage for the court's first-ever ruling on genetically modified crops[1]. This might indeed be an opportunity to strike a more permanent blow to Monsanto and its latest horror - genetically modified seeds and crops. However, read not too far between the lines here: Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer will not be part of the Court for this case - he has been excused, and rightfully so because his brother, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer heard the case in the 9th District and found AGAINST Monsanto, albeit in the form of a temporary injunction at the time, he partially wrote: "A federal action that eliminates a farmer's choice to grow non-genetically engineered crops, or a consumer's choice to eat non-genetically engineered food, is an undesirable consequence." The article further points out: "That sense of foreboding is compounded by the fact that the case comes from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a frequent source of environmental cases struck down by the Supreme Court. Last year, when the Supreme Court overturned five decisions favoring environmentalists, four had come from the 9th Circuit (Greenwire, June 25, 2009). I remind all of us that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, a former corporate attorney for Monsanto has not recused himself from this case. There are no coincidences. [1] Supreme Court to Take First Look at Genetically Modified Crops in Case With NEPA Implications ===================================================
We at Salem-News.com welcome Chuck aboard and look forward to sharing more of his stories with our readers in the future.
Salem-News.com Top Stories
Racism Mars Spring for Many Foreigners and Palestinians in Lebanon Cannabis Intelligence Contest: Medical Marijuana Patients Vs Dwight Holton... the Patients Won Egypt's Presidential Elections: A Revolution at the Crossroads (Video) Israel's Nuclear Whistle Blower's June 6 Appeal Seeking Revocation of Citizenship as the Way to Freedom from Israel Sri Lanka's Missing Thousands
Comments eddie zawaski April 26, 2010 5:52 pm (Pacific time) The likely reason that Thomas has not recused himself from this case is that Scalia, Alito and the rest all probably have big chunks of Monsanto stock in their portfolios and are thus anxious to push more GMO food product down our throats with this next decision. As it is now constituted, this court serves no one but its corporate masters [Return to Top]View Most Commented on Leave a comment on this story. HTML tags and certain characters are removed - (numbers, letters only or post may be cut short.) certain words are banned to stop spammers. All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied. ©2011 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.Articles for April 25, 2010 | Articles for April 26, 2010 | Articles for April 27, 2010 | ![]()
Use PayPal to
contribute to Salem-News.com: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Hear Raymo's Songs | |
| Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2012 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com. Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | |||