Tuesday May 21, 2019
Dec-04-2010 05:11TweetFollow @OregonNews
The Insanity of Saddam Hussein's Human Meat GrinderTim King Salem-News.com
Shredding your way to war with lies...
(SALEM / BAGHDAD) - I first heard of the 'human meat grinder' when I was in Baghdad, Iraq in 2008 on a particularly hot summer day, standing on Saddam Hussein's old parade ground.
I visited with a U.S. Army historian that day; it was a unique coincidence that we found each other beneath the famous crossed swords, as I'm always in the market for historical information.
We discussed several important points about the war that in his mind, really justified the Coalition's invasion of Iraq. I have to say that at the time, he was convincing.
And in all fairness, this man probably believed what he said to be true, I would like to think so.
This officer had heard the story that dated back to 2003, when information about the alleged 'human mean grinder' first hit the presses at the Independent with statements from Ken Joseph Jr., who was one of the anti-war human shields that had entered Iraq in 2003.
Joseph, who said he was a pastor with the Assyrian Church, apparently had a real change of heart after hearing horrible stories about Hussein's meat grinder in Baghdad.
He apparently went from peace activist to war advocate while he was there.
The Independent quoted Joseph saying:
So now, all these years later, I was telling an associate about that terrible 'meat grinder' that Saddam and his Baathist party friends reportedly used to do away with their enemy's bodies, and she asked, "Do you know that for a fact"?
I replied, "Well, I was told about it by several people including a light colonel. I was told at one point that it was not visible, but 'just out of sight' from where I was standing."
I know I probably sounded a bit adamant; not over the top but hey, this is a story I've been telling for a couple of years now.
So I Googled, "baghdad saddam hussein's meat grinder" and quickly found Wikipedia's page about this awful device that by the sound of it, would have been a good addition to a Spanish Inquisition torture chamber. It turns out to be more ironic than expected.
As it turns out, this story is a big zero, with no proof whatsoever. Anyone out there reading this; the only legitimate argument is the missing proof. If I am wrong that is fine, but I don't think so.
It appears by all accounts that this story is just more high level piece of government designed propaganda specifically inserted into the minds of western people through media reports.
It brings to mind the old adage, Believe only half of what you see and nothing that you hear. That expression still has a place in the world, maybe now more than ever.
We can add this staunch piece of propaganda to the pile. List it next to the WMD's that were never found, Iran's non-existent nuclear weapons program, Usama bin Laden's role as a 'blacksheep' in Saudi Arabia, Israel's peaceful intentions, and George W. Bush's 'Don't ask, Don't admit' military record.
It isn't that we've simply been had. This is a serious matter. The only thing any westerner has to ask and face is simple:
I'll say this much; in a Red Dawn scenario, if the Iraqi people who side with Americans were indeed the Americans, they might be the first to rat their neighbor out and sew the red star on their shoulder.
I don't think that is universal by any means and there are many great Iraqi people who have worked with the Coalition, but to what eventual end?
The plastic shredder into which Saddam and Qusay Hussein are said to have fed opponents of their Baathist rule, first came to light in press reports preceding the 2003 Invasion of Iraq.
Worldwide attention was focused on these allegations and they invariably created strong support for military action in Iraq. The decisions of various U.S. legislators in supporting the military invasion of Iraq, may have been different if they had known the meat grinder story was little more than an unfounded allegation.
Stories took full court advantage; articles had racy headlines like: "See men shredded, then say you don't back war".
It would take a full year for the officials channels to recognize that there never was evidence to support the existence of such a machine.
And I heard about it as a reporter in Baghdad from a field grade officer who specialized in war history for the U.S. Army. You would at least think he would have known four full years after the story was busted.
Shredding the Allegation of Rev. Kenneth Joseph Jr.
It was CounterPunch that finally took the story from the man calling himself Rev. Kenneth Joseph Jr. to task. As it turns out, people actually involved in the Human Shield project said they had never heard of the guy.
Human shield activists suggested that if Joseph had indeed gone to Iraq, it was for different, more personal reasons. Some reportedly said that if he was there at all, he was likely "motivated by his campaign for 'Assyrian Independence' rather than the welfare of the Iraqi people in the face of an invasion," Wikipedia's page on the event relates.
But then even that scenario appeared to fade from real possibility when Bishop Mar Bawai Soro of the Assyrian Church, reportedly said that Joseph was not a pastor as he claimed, and had no connection to their organization.
However today, a search of the Assyrian Christian News Website reveals significant information about a Rev. Ken Joseph Jr. who is of Iraqi descent. I did not see a specific reference to the Human Shield project, which our writer Ken O'Keefe was very involved in, but every indication is there to indicate that Rev. Kenneth Joseph Jr. is authentic; contrary to statements currently posted on Wikipedia and also with other media sources.
I don't believe this impacts the reality of the point that Saddam Hussein's alleged meat grinder was propaganda, released at a key time to influence the support of a devastating war based on false intelligence. Still, it has been heavily reported that Joseph possibly never have existed, and that does not seem to be the case. Hopefully both Ken O;Keefe and Ken Joseph Jr. will share their thoughts in the comments or for a follow-up article
More Meat Grinder Myths?
One interesting article published by the International Center for Transitional Justice, His Country Lost, Saddam Tries to Rule in Court, by Bloomberg's Ann Woolner, suggests that the meat grinder is tied to a failed assassination attempt on Saddam Hussein in the early 1980's. Either way it seems startlingly clear that the meat grinder notion helped convict the Iraqi leader and contributed to his death sentence.
Woolner wrote: "They spoke of mass arrests, infants included, in the town of Dujail after a failed assassination attempt against Hussein in 1982. People were beaten and raped, burned and tortured with electrical shocks, they said. One witness said he saw a meat grinder with human hair and blood beneath it."
This is interesting, as there is no reference to the fact that the town of al Dujayl was the place where an elaborate plot was hatched to kill the Iraqi president in a deadly surprise attack, as he traveled through this Shi'ite village with his motorcade.
That is what led to the retaliation against these people in 1982. It was an extremely significant event that left several members of Hussein's presidential security team dead and wounded, but the president himself uninjured.
I was told that the old people had been in prison for a long time. But what is a national leader supposed to do when an entire town works in unison, obviously without success, to take their lives, killing some of the president's men in the process? I think we would call it Terrorism and Treason here in the US.
So why would people in this Shi'ite town have wanted to kill their president?
Because he was progressive; a liberal thinker, which is contrary to how he was portrayed in western press.
According to Wikipedia:
So yes, Saddam Hussein was unpopular with these folks because he wasn't religious enough. And this is the leader the United States soiled its reputation pursuing and killing while driving Iraq into the darkest depths of war torn despair. And every Iraqi that tried to defend their nation against the unjustified invasion was deemed a 'terrorist'. I was in this same town, al Dujayl, in Oct. 2008, just after a car bomb exploded outside of a busy market across from an Iraqi Police (IP) station, killing 32 people and injuring between 30 and 50.
A 101st Airborne Lieutenant at the time explained: "An unknown insurgent comes up and brings the vehicle, either targeting the IP station across the street or the market. Detonates the vehicle right around 18:00, the time when most people have stopped fasting for Ramadan and have gone to the market, or restaurants around the market area to eat dinner, or get food for dinner, and blew the vehicle up."
Now I feel compelled to question whether it really was an 'insurgent' who set that bomb off, at this point how can we be sure it was not a Coalition member? Or, if not perhaps Coalition money paid for it to drive the war effort and further terrify and divide the local populace?
Since we know that British soldiers were caught by Iraqi police posing as Arabs in a vehicle laden with deadly weapons, and that it led to a bloody shootout that left people on the Coalition side dead, we know we can't believe anything they say without real corroborating evidence.
Learning our Lessons
This story confirms what many have always known; that almost every statement issued to justify the war was fabricated. There was never a justifiable reason for the invasion of Iraq.
Now I will question whether any of the other horrible stories are true, like the ones about Saddam Hussein's son's habit of plucking married women out of their husband's arms as they walked down the street in Baghdad. I suspect that is probably fiction also at this point.
How about the 72 virgins story, how many millions have heard of this? It is another piece of western fantasy. There is not a shred of evidence in the Holy Qur'an to substantiate that crazy assertion. The only people who will tell you about it are westerners who believe it, and people from the Mideast willing to sell out the truth. Even if there is a bizarre remote example of this having happened, it still flies in the face of everything we know about the history of Islam.
People suggested that the war was over oil, and that is absolutely true as it turns out, though it certainly hasn't meant relief in domestic gas prices.
The only political benefactor to the chaos and disarray in the Middle east brought about by the wars, is Israel. Like President Mahmoud Ahmadenajad in Iran, Saddam Hussein was supportive of the Palestinian cause and openly criticized Israel's illegal occupation of the post-1967 borders.
Hana Levi Julian with Arutz Sheva, the International Israel News Agency, wrote at the time of Saddam Hussein's death:
As the noose was slipped around his neck, and the trapdoor about to open for him to plunge to his death, Hussein called out, 'Allah is great. The nation will be victorious, and Palestine is Arab.'
She related how in Israel, the death of Saddam Hussein was welcomed.
Former Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom, writing for Ynet, explained, "We have no reason to mourn the death of Saddam... Let us not forget the dozens of Scuds he fired at Israel with the intent of killing innocent people. This cruel dictator did everything he could to harm the State of Israel and the stability of the Middle East. For years he aided and funded Palestinian terrorism in the territories and within the State of Israel."
The Magnitude and Reality of War
Iraq is in shambles, and don't believe the people who tell you otherwise. Some areas are certainly more miserable than others, but no society can exist with a million of their own citizens killed by an invading occupying power and still be happy, successful, or by any means fortunate.
Don't get me wrong, the Iraqi people will survive; those who have survived have grown very strong and rugged over the last few years, but they are fragmented and damaged by a cruel senseless war that gained nothing at all, for anyone.
Bush killed so many more Iraqi's than Hussein did; the numbers aren't even slightly comparable. And why did Saddam Hussein go after the Kurds? He went for them because the first Pres. Bush encouraged them to stand up and revolt.
Then American politicians turned their backs after setting them up for the big fall.
That was a cold move from the George Herbert Walker Bush Administration. The United States had absolutely no good reason for going to Iraq either time.
In the end, there never has been a shred of evidence to confirm the existence of this reported body disposal machine
One witness at Saddam's trial in December 2005 claimed to have seen it. Saddam's half-brother, Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti, barracked the witness, shouting he "should act in the cinema."
Journalist Brendan O'Neill challenged the existence of the shredder in The Spectator and The Guardian in February 2004. Then again in February 2010, he published the article titled, "Neither Amnesty International nor Human Rights Watch, in their numerous investigations into human rights abuses in Iraq, had ever heard anyone talk of a human-shredding machine."
The shredding machine story has been compared to the story of Iraqi soldiers "throwing babies from incubators" during the invasion of Kuwait in October 1990. Wikipedia explains that this influential report was presented as the 'eye-witness testimony' of a 15-year old Kuwaiti girl named Nurse Nayirah. Years later it emerged that she was the daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwait's ambassador to the United States, and that the story itself was entirely the creation of the Hill & Knowlton public relations firm employed by the Kuwaitis.
Dec-09-2005: International Center for Transitional Justice
Articles for December 3, 2010 | Articles for December 4, 2010 | Articles for December 5, 2010