Friday April 19, 2024
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

Feb-05-2008 07:35printcomments

Shark Fin Soup Contributes to Worldwide Population Decline

From the Editors of E/The Environmental Magazine

dead tiger sharks
Photo courtesy: elasmodiver.com

(SALEM, Ore.) - Dear EarthTalk: What is the status of sharks around the world? I see occasional stories about sharks attacking humans, but on balance aren’t we a lot more brutal to them then they are to us? -- Pam Hitschler, Radnor, PA

ET: It’s true that humans do a lot more damage to shark populations than vice versa. Marine biologists report that sharks are in rapid decline around the world.
In the North Atlantic Ocean, shark populations have declined more than 50 percent over the past 20 years alone, with some species now nearing extinction.

Experts see the primary cause as overfishing, which depletes sharks as well as their prey. Sharks are especially vulnerable to illegal “longlines” (fishing nets strung across dozens if not hundreds of miles of ocean), where they get inadvertently snared along with the tuna and swordfish fishermen intend to catch.

Rising demand for shark fin soup in is also contributing to the demise of sharks. According to a report by Wildaid, shark fins are among the most expensive seafood products in the world, selling for some $700 per kilogram on the Hong Kong market. With prices like that, many longline fishermen, who are already operating illegally, are happy to augment their incomes by “finning” a few sharks along the way. (Finning is the practice of removing a fin from a shark and discarding the rest of the carcass at sea.)

Often, threatened wildlife species manage to maintain their numbers in spite of excessive human predation. But sharks face an especially uphill battle, says renowned shark expert Ransom Myers, because they “take a long time to mature and have relatively few babies.”


So what is being done to save sharks? In the U.S., the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation Act is the primary law that oversees the conservation of U.S. fisheries and has established various management regulations for 39 species of sharks in the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico. It outlaws finning if the carcass is discarded but not if the rest of carcass is kept, clearly an unfortunate loophole.

The U.S. also helped develop a United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization treaty (the International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks) whereby 87 countries agreed to develop their own plans for the conservation of sharks. However, only two countries—the U.S. and Australia—have lived up to the agreement. The U.S. plan is administered by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which has been working with regional fisheries authorities to make sure fishermen are sticking to cautiously low quotas regarding the number of sharks they are allowed to catch.

What can consumers do to save the sharks? The Monterey Bay Aquarium in Monterey, California urges consumers to avoid all shark products, not just on restaurant menus but also all souvenirs such as jaws and teeth, and shark-cartilage pills, which have been touted as cancer cures but which have been proven to be completely ineffective and are now widely considered a scam. The aquarium also encourages consumers to support with their pocketbooks conservation groups working to protect sharks and oceans, and specifically those working to set aside marine reserves that are off-limits to fishing.

GOT AN ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTION? Send it to: EarthTalk, c/o E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; submit it at: www.emagazine.com/earthtalk/thisweek/, or e-mail: earthtalk@emagazine.com. Read past columns at: emagazine.com/earthtalk/archives.php.




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



Neal Feldman February 5, 2008 11:33 am (Pacific time)

Humans consider sharks a threat, an they are a threat to swimmers they come across. People tend, for good or ill, to try and eliminate threats. Unfortunately sharks are unable to be negotiated with or to make treaties with so killing them is the only option other than just ceding the entirety of the world's oceans to them. Unfortunate but true. I'm not sure soup is the reason though. Sharks are harvested for a great many things beyond safety. And how is it 'an unfortunate loophole' to allow the use of the fin if the rest of the shark is harvested too (instead of just slashing off the fin and dumping the rest back into the ocean)? And I agree with the laws banning longlines and other stripmining fishing methods. But this author seems to be against commercial fishing in general. Between those against all fishing, PETA, those who object to reasonable farming etc if we adhered to all their demands we could not even drink water much less eat anything. Is it any wonder they tend to be dismissed as unreasonable? I respect those who want to protect species from extinction but to effectively do so you cannot come across as a human (in general) hating kook. Ah well...

[Return to Top]
©2024 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for February 4, 2008 | Articles for February 5, 2008 | Articles for February 6, 2008
The NAACP of the Willamette Valley

Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar

Support
Salem-News.com:

Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin

Click here for all of William's articles and letters.

googlec507860f6901db00.html