|
Salem-News.com - November 22, 2009 - 11:42 am | |||
|
SNc Channels:
Search
About Salem-News.com is a locally-owned news service for Salem - Oregon's capitol city and the region surrounding it. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Jul-24-2006 15:24![]()
Op-Ed: Nanotechnology Heavily Funded as People SufferOp-Ed by: Tim King Salem-News.comAs Oregon struggles to feed and care for its citizens, millions will be invested in companies that build military equipment. The word is nanotechnhology and it has little to do with making life better for people here.
(SALEM) - One of the terms the Bush administration has brought forward in recent years is nanotechnology, and now Oregon learns that billions of dollars will come to our state to help develop the various different nanotechnologies that our nation is using to build its military might in a time of war.
That sounds good right?
What it means in reality, is that all sorts of private companies are going to receive big bucks to do things like lining Freightliner trucks with armor, they get $35 million for that.
Too bad they couldn’t have just stuck with the Humvees before all those soldiers and Marines were killed because they didn’t have armor plating.
Seemed like a small request at the time, but as the chickenhawks made war in Iraq, they waged a different campaign against the rights of human beings everywhere, including their own countrymen.
Salem-News.com Top Stories
Winter Storm and High Wind Warnings Blow into NorthWest Police Say Driving Rampage Ends in Fatal Shots Afghanistan, the Unlearned Lesson Greenscam: Scientific Mass Manipulation in Action Living the Lie: Agent Orange Activist Confronts Monsanto Comments MJ July 25, 2006 11:53 am (Pacific time) Reallocating fuding from the DoD to other government agencies does not solve long term social probelms or patch short term problems in your state. Do you know who the largest funding agency is for breast cancer research? It is the Army. A majority of DoD research is not for better ways of killing people, it is for protecting our soldiers, and a good portion of this military technology is translated into civilian technology. Nanotechnology is one of the most important technology revolutions to come in the history of man, and the DoD will be a major part of bringing Nanotechology to civilian life. Check out the DoD's Small Business Innovation Research program (http://www.dodsbir.net/solicitation/sbir062/default.htm) and look at what areas the DoD is funding in Nanotech research. You will find most of it has social implications. Remember, without the DoD, we wouldn't even be able to have this conversation over this series of tubes we call the Internet. Tim King July 25, 2006 10:30 am (Pacific time) Hey MJ, Thanks for pointing out the spelling error. I wish technology had given you the tools to grow in a different way so that you can understand the point of the article. Yes, technology is good, of course, but I am questioning the amounts awarded, the timing and the priorities. MJ July 25, 2006 9:52 am (Pacific time) Is the author crazy? Or just ignorant? Maybe my terminology is designed to keep him guessing. I would suggest the author looks up "crazy" and "ignorant" on Wikipedia (not Wickepedia), but then again, if the author can't find the definitions on the Internet, he will probably just give up. BlackSun July 25, 2006 9:50 am (Pacific time) This is one of the most short-sighted editorials I've ever read. Nanotechnology is absolutely vital to human survival. To face the problems of climate change, pollution, and renewable energy, nanotech is absolutely essential. If you divert money from such research to what you call more "human" concerns, you will in the long run actually hurt far more people than you help. The military gets everything first. So do the rich. Life is not fair. But in the end, everyone benefits. Stop promoting this paranoid anti-technology nonsense. Nanotech IS humanity. The processes being researched are the same processes that power our cells, and the cells of plants. Everything alive is a complex nanomachine. To be against nanotechnology is to be against the knowledge of life itself. Tim King July 25, 2006 9:35 am (Pacific time) Cam, I can name a lot of positive things that were the fallout of war, but good things can be derived from most anything. As long as the war machine is more important than people, we'll go on waiting. Before making medicine better, they should figure out how to get it to the people who need it. cam July 25, 2006 7:12 am (Pacific time) nanotech can help almost any aspect of human life from making water cleaner, better medicine, and making the things we use work better. the military always funds new technology before they get to the private sector to make our lives better. the computer your using today is partially a result of military funding. so i do think that you are missing something, a big something sirisha July 25, 2006 1:45 am (Pacific time) very nice [Return to Top]Leave a comment on this story. HTML tags and certain characters are removed - (numbers, letters only or post may be cut short.) certain words are banned to stop spammers. All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied. ©2009 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.Articles for July 23, 2006 | Articles for July 24, 2006 | Articles for July 25, 2006 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Hear Raymo's Songs ![]() ![]() Donate or Send a
Love Box today! | |
| Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2009 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com. Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | |||