Sunday December 1, 2024
| |||
SNc Channels: HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe Search About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News. Publisher: Bonnie King CONTACT: Newsroom@Salem-news.com Advertising: Adsales@Salem-news.com ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
Jun-30-2023 17:10TweetFollow @OregonNews Oregon Supreme Court Ruling Protects Anti-LGBTQ DiscriminationSalem-News.comLegislative LGBTQ Caucus condemns decision in 303 Creative LLC v Elenis
(SALEM, Ore.) - Today, the U.S. Supreme Court struck a major blow to all Americans’ civil rights, particularly those of the LGBTQ community, with their unjust decision in the 303 Creative LLC v Elenis case. The Oregon Legislature’s LGBTQ Caucus released the following statement condemning the decision: “This decision is proof that even with historic victories, we still have a long way to go for everyone – regardless of who they love or how they identify – to be equal in this nation. "We will never live up to our pledge of liberty and justice for all as long as hate and bigotry are protected by the powerful. "We condemn this discriminatory decision in the strongest possible terms. “This decision will not make us more free. It oppresses a community built on love and acceptance. “Oregon will continue to be a beacon of hope. We will continue to do everything we can to protect every Oregonians’ right to love who they love and live as themselves. We will not give up, and, in the end, we will be on the right side of history.” “Today the Court, for the first time in its history, grants a business open to the public a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissent, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. “Today is a sad day in American constitutional law and in the lives of LGBT people,” Sotomayor wrote. “The immediate, symbolic effect of the decision is to mark gays and lesbians for second-class status.” The Oregon Legislature’s LGBTQ Caucus strives to promote the rights and freedoms of every Oregonian. Members of the caucus are Senate Majority Leader Kate Lieber (D - Beaverton & SW Portland), Representative Ben Bowman (D - Tigard, Metzger, & South Beaverton), Representative Farrah Chaichi (D - Aloha), Representative Dacia Grayber (D - SW Portland & East Beaverton), Representative Travis Nelson (D - N/NE Portland), and Representative Rob Nosse (D - Portland). Source: The Oregon Legislature’s LGBTQ Caucus _________________________________________
Articles for June 29, 2023 | Articles for June 30, 2023 | | Quick Links
DININGWillamette UniversityGoudy Commons Cafe Dine on the Queen Willamette Queen Sternwheeler MUST SEE SALEMOregon Capitol ToursCapitol History Gateway Willamette River Ride Willamette Queen Sternwheeler Historic Home Tours: Deepwood Museum The Bush House Gaiety Hollow Garden AUCTIONS - APPRAISALSAuction Masters & AppraisalsCONSTRUCTION SERVICESRoofing and ContractingSheridan, Ore. ONLINE SHOPPINGSpecial Occasion DressesAdvertise with Salem-NewsContact:AdSales@Salem-News.com Support Salem-News.com: | |
Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2024 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.
William Oldman June 2, 2024 5:49 pm (Pacific time)
This is not a case of discrimination. This is a case involving personal freedom. People are free to do what they wish or refuse to do what they don't wish to do. The business customer can go to a business that is happy to serve them. They have no right to force a business to serve them if they don't want to do so.
Mason Freeman June 2, 2024 5:39 pm (Pacific time)
This decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is a good decision, and is very fair for both parties, because it would be unjust to force a business owner to serve someone they don't want to serve, regardless of what their beliefs are... Such as, if a LGBTQ business owner didn't want to serve a couple because they were wearing shirts that say, "marriage is between one man and one woman" or "there are only 2 genders, and nobody can change their gender because it is in their DNA," then the business owner has that right to refuse service. Many businesses have a sign that says, "we have a right to refuse service to anyone." That is not based on any cultural reason. No party can force their viewpoint onto other people. If service is refused, the customer can go to the next business where they will be gladly served for their needs. Many people will say, "I don't like such and such business." Fine. They can go to a business that they DO like. It is as easy as driving their car a mile or so.
[Return to Top]©2024 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.