Tuesday March 20, 2018
SNc Channels:

About Salem-News.com


May-08-2010 18:48printcomments

Climategate Controversy Update

Global warming should be a non-partisan issue.

Courtesy: anunews.net

(SAN FRANCISCO) - Last November, 1,000 stolen e-mails from one of the world’s leading climate research centers in Britain seemed to challenge the scientific consensus that global warming is happening and that it is induced by human activity.

The e-mails appeared to show researchers scolding skeptics of global warming, discussing ways to hide their data, and discussing ways to keep skeptics' research out of peer-reviewed publications. One e-mail authored by researcher Phil Jones seemed to suggest using a "trick" to "hide the decline" of temperatures.

The publication of the e-mails just before the Copenhagen climate change summit last December created a furor, with skeptics of man-made climate change calling the e-mails “ClimateGate” and claiming them as proof that the science behind global warming had been exaggerated or even made up altogether.

On March 31st, the British House of Commons’ Science and Technology Committee largely cleared the "ClimateGate" researchers involved, finding no evidence to support charges that the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit or its director, Phil Jones, had tampered with data or perverted the peer review process to exaggerate the threat of global warming.

"ClimateGate" had its effect on U.S. public opinion. A recent Gallup poll shows that 48 percent of Americans believe the seriousness of global warming is generally exaggerated. Many Americans believe that, if there is global warming, it is cyclical and will pass over time or the scientists will discover an eleventh hour fix for the problem. ClimateGate and the public's skepticism provides cover for our politicians to avoid the difficult task of addressing global warming.

Senator James Inhofe (R. Okl) and Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R. Cal) probably represent the views of global warming deniers. Senator Inhofe called "the threat of catastrophic global warming the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people." And Rep. Rohrabacher called the science behind global warming "emotional junk science." Even that eminent scientist Sarah Palin called global warming studies "snake oil science."

Regardless of the so-called ClimateGate controversy, it has long been known that humans impact our atmosphere severely and our unrelenting production of carbon dioxide (and other greenhouse gases) increase the effects of the naturally occurring "greenhouse effect" that keeps our planet habitable. The more CO2 we pump into our atmosphere, the warmer the atmosphere gets. This is a scientific fact based on decades of scientific study. The main cause of the increase in global average temperatures in recent history is not because of any natural cycle -- although natural cycles do exist -- it is because of man. The bottom line: 255 members of the National Academy of Sciences published a letter in the May 7, 2010 issue of the journal Science, which reads in part, "There is compelling, comprehensive and consistent objective evidence that humans are changing the climate in ways that threaten our societies and the ecosystem on which we depend."

Denying global warming and its causes threatens all of humanity with slow, painful, untimely deaths. Scientists overwhelmingly agree that increasing global temperatures will cause sea levels to rise and will produce more intense weather and changes in precipitation patterns, changes in crop yields, glacier melting, extinction of species and the spread of disease. Putting our heads in the sand is not going to make global warming go away.

Global warming should be a non-partisan issue. It concerns us all whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal, or anything in between. There is, however, a promising first step: Senators John Kerry (D. Mass) and Joe Lieberman (I. Conn) reportedly will unveil their "climate change and energy" bill. The bill intends to cut greenhouse gas emissions nationwide 20 percent by the year 2020 and 83 percent by 2050, while spurring nuclear power and investing in clean coal technology designed to trap carbon dioxide spewed by power plants. But, of course, finding 60 Senate votes will be a challenge.


Salem-News.com writer Ralph E. Stone was born in Massachusetts. He is a graduate of both Middlebury College and Suffolk Law School. We are very fortunate to have this writer's talents in this troubling world; Ralph has an eye for detail that others miss.

As is the case with many Salem-News.com writers, Ralph is an American Veteran who served in war. Ralph served his nation after college as a U.S. Army officer during the Vietnam war. After Vietnam, he went on to have a career with the Federal Trade Commission as an Attorney specializing in Consumer and Antitrust Law.

Over the years, Ralph has traveled extensively with his wife Judi, taking in data from all over the world, which today adds to his collective knowledge about extremely important subjects like the economy and taxation. You can send Ralph an email at this address stonere@earthlink.net

Comments Leave a comment on this story.

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

Rockyspoon May 16, 2010 9:04 am (Pacific time)

A comment has been posted that the carbon deposits we're utilizing now took billions of years to develop. Nope. See: http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html To summarize, the Carboniferous Period, specifically the Pennsylvanian (320 to 286 mya) is when these deposits were formed. And the earth's current level of CO2 is IMPOVERISHED--most of geologic history has seen much higher levels (Late Ordovician at 4400 ppm (12 x current); Jurassic at 1800 ppma (4.7 x); Cambrian at 7000 ppm (18 x). Today's level is about 390 ppm. Don't be fooled by false information.

Rockyspoon May 14, 2010 4:22 am (Pacific time)

The unnamed comment from May 9, 2010 11:01 am above typifies the AGW camp: They don't know the entire truth but they're willing to tell everybody that man's addition of CO2 to the atmosphere is causing climate change. First, as a scientist I can tell you "climate change" is the modus operandi of earth--that's the NORM! Second, there is practically no impact of CO2 on climate variability--we're coming out of The Little Ice age and the slight warming of the earth is a response to that. If you read the Climategate emails you'll find all sorts of anti-scientific behavior (and what the British House of Commons did in their review was a complete whitewash; basically a joke). Finally, CO2 has tremendous benefit; we're seeing a greening of the earth. You'd think those most concerned with the environment would be happy about that, but this really isn't about making life better for earth's population. No, it is about tax increases, power, and control. Follow the money trail; it leads to world governance and the UN.

Zorro May 11, 2010 10:05 am (Pacific time)

I love how the people that make partisan attacks, then say things like "Global warming should be a non-partisan issue," hypocritical? And don't forget to use weasel words like "largely cleared"  ranks right up there with sorta pregnant, or that Governor Palin's opinion should be dismissed because she is not a scientist, written by a lawyer. Was Satan to busy to submit an article?

May 9, 2010 11:01 am (Pacific time)

I do not know the entire truth, but by looking at the satellite images of ice caps, it seems clear that something is happening. My concern is that, in 100 years, people have effectively removed carbon deposits that took BILLIONS of years to develop and put the resulting pollution into the environment. I have to believe that their is some impact.

George Ragos May 9, 2010 2:17 pm (Pacific time)

As long as we tax the sh*t out of everything and keep the money going in "our" pockets, everything will be just fine, right...? Wrong!!!!!  BYE-BYE Globalwarming...!!!

Anonymous May 9, 2010 1:10 pm (Pacific time)

some of us check the FUNDING of the scientists you mention. Some of us know that al of the gore is using the same tactic they used for the enron catastrophe, some of us have actually read the emails from climategate, I could go on all day. Some of us know, 30,000 scientists who disagree, are NOT on the bankers payroll, like the ones you mention are... give it a break. We have pollution, but the U.S. military complex, and those huge ships in the ocean cause more of it than all human beings for ten years. Try looking at what volcanoes do? dear lord http://www.heartland.org/policybot/results/23387/30000_Scientists_Sign_Petition_on_Global_Warming.html

[Return to Top]
©2018 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.

Articles for May 7, 2010 | Articles for May 8, 2010 | Articles for May 9, 2010

Donate to Salem-News.com and help us keep the news flowing! Thank you.

Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin