Saturday September 22, 2018
SNc Channels:



May-18-2007 14:55printcomments

Oregon School for the Blind, Oregon School for the Deaf to Share Campus

The move would take place after the 2008-2009 school year.

Oregon School for the Deaf Campus in Salem
Oregon School for the Deaf Campus in Salem.

(SALEM, Ore. ) - State Schools Superintendent Susan Castillo announced Friday that after two years of study by the Department of Education and hundreds of hours of meetings with stakeholders on what would be best for students, she has decided that the Oregon School for the Blind and the Oregon School for the Deaf should be co-located on the OSD campus in Salem.

The move would take place after the 2008-2009 school year.

“It is my decision to move the Oregon School for the Blind to the OSD campus with the objective of building a strong new OSB facility, bringing operational costs down by reducing duplication and improving both school operations,” Castillo said.

“The schools, as they exist today with very high costs per student, are not sustainable. Seismic and structural considerations dictate significant facility improvements. Co-location is the only way to focus our existing resources and preserve the two schools without seeking tens of millions of dollars from the State School Fund.”

“The move would be contingent on the sale of the OSB property, generating sufficient funds to make needed changes on the OSD campus,” Castillo said. “The legislature will need to provide some assistance to allow that the funds would follow the students to the new campus.”

“I understand that change can be difficult, but after looking at all the facts it is clear that co-location is absolutely necessary if we are to best serve Oregon’s students,” Castillo said.

“I am committed to providing the leadership and resources necessary to ensure that the change is successful. I want everyone to know that all decisions associated with making this change will be made with the utmost consideration of what is best for students, their families, and the taxpayers of the state of Oregon.”

“I will work with all the affected parties and stakeholders, prior to any move, to resolve concerns that have been raised around the issues of transportation improvements, neighborhood safety, proximity to rail lines, and interaction of student populations,” Castillo said.

Castillo outlined the following program benefits for students:

New and improved facilities for students who are blind; the old OSB site will be closed.

Improvements to the buildings and facilities of the existing Oregon School for the Deaf site (for example,

Kuenzi Hall and other buildings are unsafe and need major repairs).

Added amenities for all students, such as the therapy pool and outdoor track.

Safety will be easier to manage on a single campus, and the relocation of students from the School for the Blind moves them to a safer neighborhood, according to crime statistics.

Savings resulting from consolidation of operations can be redirected to educational programs.

Cost savings include the physical plant and maintenance operations, health service operations, and food service operations; consolidation of some basic school program services required by both student populations as well as various campus-focused committees and workgroups (e.g. Safety Committee, Curriculum Committee, and some staff professional development opportunities).

“Our discussions with other states that are successfully operating two schools on a single campus highlight program benefits for students. Those states report that a single campus with a school for the blind and a school for the deaf provides students, teachers, and other staff the opportunities to promote and support the ability to live and work with others and to learn to better understand others’ perspectives and needs,” Castillo said. “The ability to provide better educational programs and services for students, coupled with significant cost savings for the state’s taxpayers, helped make the decision clear.”

The 2005 Oregon Legislature approved the budget for the Oregon Department of Education with direction to the agency to “provide a report to the interim Senate and House education committees as well as to the Emergency Board during 2005-2007 on the cost-effectiveness of transferring the program at the Oregon School for the Blind to the Oregon School for the Deaf campus. The review shall include the cost-effectiveness of contracting out of the two programs to a local education agency.”

In June 2006, Castillo assembled a study group to examine the issues and develop a set of recommendations.

The OSB/OSD Study Group made two major recommendations: first, to move OSB to OSD campus provided costs of the move do not override current cost of programs and any subsequent savings should be maintained within programs for students who are sensory impaired; second, that ODE should retain responsibility for the education of the students and subsequent programs but should move management to another public education entity, such as an ESD.

In October 2006, Castillo announced that contracting out instructional programs to a local education agency was not in the best interest of students at the state schools.

She announced that students would be served best by programs continuing to be operated by the Oregon Department of Education.

In December 2006, Castillo asked Department staff for a feasibility study on the recommendation to move the OSB programs to the OSD campus.

In March 2007, she received the analysis of the State Schools Study Committee’s recommendation to move programs from the Oregon School for the Blind to the campus of the Oregon School for the Deaf.

The analysis covered physical space, staffing requirements, special events, safety and environment, and cost/benefit analysis. That analysis served as the basis for today’s announcement to co-locate the two programs

Comments Leave a comment on this story.

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

Rosenberg May 20, 2007 6:14 pm (Pacific time)

HR, Bush's office is by election, do you know him? Does he come under a "public personality" kinda guy to you? How about any elected conservative? Castillo? Too hot in the kitchen, get out! I know a lot of people HR, some well known, currently, and also from the past, but to tell (or as some do...boast!) who, just is no big deal to me paper-target shooter. Oh, by the way, back in the late 40's I met Mr. Schwab, and if memory serves I think I told him to seek his fortune in "tires and brakes", but I'm not real positive. Though have met with him on numerous occasions since: Remember "Crooked River (Ranch) Bob?". It was back in 1969 when I bought some investment property from him and then started spending more time in that area almost each time I got back to the states. Had a former subordinate who I visited at Warm Springs (seriously disabled from wounds--Vietnam) and would take him to his favorite eating place in Prineville (and Redmond) and met Mr. Schwab there a number of times, no big deal. Many of my father's peers (he is about to turn 100) were shaker's and movers on both the state and national level, you no doubt would probably not have cared for these people HR (though you would have been welcomed by them as long as you watched your table manners), they are/were conservatives, just like me, and just like what the majority of Americans are!

Hank Ruark May 20, 2007 2:45 pm (Pacific time)

There you go with the arrogance again: "Ms. Castillo and I run in different cirles HR, we have membership security..." Care to share what makes that "security", as you so state ? Also you make it sound as if you know Supt. of Education prove that up or withdraw inference. Since her office is by election, you are obviously going over the heads of those who voted for her --with no documented statements to justify naturally-nasty terms-used.

Hank Ruark May 20, 2007 2:12 pm (Pacific time)

This one to Rosy: Name place and time when you are ready - but first have the decency to fully identify yourself. Without that no credibility exists and no rational person would ever meet you OR your cohorts. IF fearful of face-to-face --"have one of my associates give you a lesson-- you've had ten invitations to do so via ID-to-Editor and e-mail/direct; so invitation simply avoids easy way still open to you. But please wash your hands thoroughly even so...

Rosenberg May 20, 2007 1:40 pm (Pacific time)

HR I would be glad to have one of my associates give you a lesson re: slander and libel laws.

Rosenberg May 20, 2007 1:38 pm (Pacific time)

Seems Castillo has plenty of detractors, not to mention the current state of the state's educational system. Ms. Castillo and I run in different cirles HR, we have membership security...

Hank Ruark May 20, 2007 6:36 am (Pacific time)

To all: Irresponsible statements published can hurt and create legally punishable damage,as all mature, responsible adults should know, to avoid learning the hard way. "See with own eyes" as to mine-above: "shill (as in "decoy") n. : a decoy who acts as an enthusiastic customer in order to stimulate the participation of others." "libelous (as in "calumniatory") adj. : (used of statements) harmful and often untrue; tending to discredit or malign." If you are elected public official, this may wel cause real concern, and possibly even bring on public action via courts, demanded by the responsibilities of office, which include legal defense if demanded.

Hank Ruark May 19, 2007 3:01 pm (Pacific time)

To all: Again arrogant personal attack, from Iraq contractor, of all people ! Castillo longtime associate of my two sons who produced her news show at KVAL-TV. I know her both personally and professionally --and can assure you which one here is the "mindless shill". What contact with her have you ever had to make such inane and even libelous statement ? IF none, where's basis for your statement ? Her actions by longtime fiat from Legislature, which also tells you a bit more about the basis for statement here. Credibility depends on deep check vs what's stated. "See with own eyes" on this one.

Rosenberg May 19, 2007 10:16 am (Pacific time)

Eric, Castillo is simply a mindless shill for forces that are not the kind we need...

Hank Ruark May 18, 2007 7:37 pm (Pacific time)

Eric et al: Ever worked at OD/Ed, Eric ? It is a state administrative agency eventually controlled and directed by Legislature. This action began by 2005 direction of Legislature, has been thoroughly studied by their fiat, and action then determined by further review. You and others may not like it, but that neither allows nor calls for yr remark. Unless, of course, you are educational expert, have now studied the study, discussed with professionals participating and then made up your mind. That's what government does and it remains strong and open and honest so long as we all support its structure and actions.

Hmmm.. May 18, 2007 4:26 pm (Pacific time)

Do you think they will all play on the same playground together...?

Eric May 18, 2007 3:58 pm (Pacific time)

Castillo = Hitler

[Return to Top]
©2018 All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of

Articles for May 17, 2007 | Articles for May 18, 2007 | Articles for May 19, 2007
Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin

Since 1985, Tattoo Mike is one of the most reputable tattoo artists in Oregon.

Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.

Call 503-362-6858 to Order Ahead  or for Party Reservations!

The NAACP of the Willamette Valley