Thursday April 25, 2024
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

May-19-2009 09:22printcomments

Group Says Jobs in Oregon Will Remain Scarce Well Into Next Decade

Employment data show "need for a stable public sector," OCPP says.

Unemployment
Salem-News.com

(SILVERTON, Ore.) - An analysis of today's employment numbers shows that there are fewer jobs for working-age Oregonians than in the worst year of the previous recession, which was 2003.

The analysis by the Oregon Center for Public Policy in Silverton also shows that the ratio of jobs to workers will not surpass the 2003 low point until 2015.

Based on today's release of employment numbers, OCPP estimated that there are now 67.2 nonfarm payroll jobs in Oregon for every 100 working-age Oregonians, compared to 70.2 jobs for every 100 working-age Oregonians in 2003. Analysis of the state's most recent economic forecast shows that the job market will not exceed the 2003 level until 2015, according to OCPP. (See chart on page 3 of PDF copy of this news release.)

"The prospect that the dismal job market will stretch over several years underscores the need for a stable public sector," said OCPP policy analyst Michael Leachman. "Sustaining public spending on health care, schools, universities and assistance for vulnerable families will keep the job market from deteriorating even further."

The Oregon Employment Department reported today that the state's unemployment level was 12.0 percent in April, essentially unchanged from March. The state has lost 103,500 jobs since December 2007. The picture will get worse before it gets better, according to the public policy research institute. In 2010 the jobs-to-workers ratio is expected to fall to 65.7, said Leachman. In other words, next year there will be four fewer jobs for every 100 working-age Oregonians than during the worst year of the prior recession.

Oregonians faced an unfavorable job market even before the start of the current recession, said Leachman. He noted that despite several years of economic growth, the number of available jobs compared to the working-age population never bounced back to the level of 2000, just before the onset of the last recession.

"Oregon workers never regained the relatively strong bargaining position they enjoyed in 2000, so wage gains lagged even as the economy rebounded," said Leachman.

In view of the relative scarcity of jobs, the state must step in to keep the situation from getting even worse, according to Leachman.

"Public investments preserve and create jobs in the short term and bring matching federal dollars into the state economy," said Leachman. "In the long term, they help lay the foundations for future growth."

One example, according to Leachman, is the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, which provides cash assistance to very poor families who cannot find work. "For every dollar Oregon spends sustaining the TANF program," he said, "we get four dollars in federal stimulus money. That money stays in Washington, D.C., if we slash TANF."

Investing in TANF helps reduce child poverty, bringing long-term economic benefits to Oregon, said Leachman. He cited a respected national study finding that child poverty costs the U.S. $500 billion annually in lost economic activity.

Leachman also recommended that Oregon further strengthen its unemployment insurance system, which provides stability to both workers and the economy. He called for Oregon to eliminate the practice of excluding part-time workers from receiving unemployment benefits and to allow low-income workers to receive job training while receiving benefits.

"Workers will endure tough times over the next few years," said Leachman, "but now is the time to plant the seeds for a future of broadly shared prosperity."

The Oregon Center for Public Policy is a non-partisan research institute that does in-depth research and analysis on budget, tax and economic issues. The Center's goal is to improve decision making and generate more opportunities for all Oregonians.




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



Charles May 19, 2009 10:30 am (Pacific time)

Where does the money come from to pay for these above discussed costs? Other states are doing much better than Oregon, why? I suggest that the people who have been running this state for the last couple of decades have never found a tax or fee they find objectionable. Subsequently it has caused Oregon to lose businesses, who simply relocate to states, like Texas for example, that are business friendly, or not to even move here to begin with unless huge tax breaks are provided. It has been obvious to even those who lack a formal educational economic background that lower taxes/fees generate more revenue while also helping private businesses prosper. Until the Oregon voter starts voting for elected officals the same way they vote down new costs via the referendum process, expect the economy to worsen.

[Return to Top]
©2024 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for May 18, 2009 | Articles for May 19, 2009 | Articles for May 20, 2009
The NAACP of the Willamette Valley

Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.

Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin

Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar



Sean Flynn was a photojournalist in Vietnam, taken captive in 1970 in Cambodia and never seen again.