Monday September 26, 2016
Oct-13-2010 01:30TweetFollow @OregonNews
Behind Federal Government's Lies: Real Economic Numbers Prove US in Great DepressionTerrence Aym Salem-News.com
They're using skewed numbers based on a purposefully misleading method of calculating the number. At best they're liars, at worst, criminals.
(CHICAGO) - The US government has been playing with the economic numbers for years and now the statistics have become nothing more than a carnival shell game.
Unfounded allegations? Read on...
John Williams* of American Business Analytics & Research LLC, has meticulously compiled the real numbers for inflation, unemployment, the money supply, and several other closely watched economic indices. The real numbers are more than just eye-opening, they are downright disastrous.
Numbers reveal an economy as bad as 1930s depression.
The statistics Williams uses are based on the original formulas the United States government used for years before they were changed to hide the economic meltdown Washington’s policies were creating. Some have accused the Social Security system as being nothing more than a big Ponzi scheme. Williams' graphs prove the entire federal government has become the sanctuary of cons and criminals running a multi-trillion dollar scam on the backs of American citizens.
The sad fact is, both Republicans and Democrats have been guilty of covering up and furthering the scam while mouthing political bromides and wrapping themselves with platitudes and quotes from the Constitution.
These numbers tend to prove that neither political party is for free enterprise or the proverbial "little guy" as their policies are destroying both.
Is the real inflation rate under 10 percent?
Much of the major news media-as many Americans have finally come to realize—is in collusion with governments at the federal, state and county level. Gone are the days when journalists were true watchdogs over the public till and promoters of good government. Most news organizations have become corporate organs attached to the government at the hip, and citizens have paid a dear price for this unholy alliance.
Williams explains that the actual US rate of inflation "reflects our estimate of inflation for today as if it were calculated the same way it was in 1990." In other words, the index uses the same methodology that was in use twenty years ago. the result is an accurate picture of the country falling over a cliff.
Using the same calculations and weighted average to calculate the current annual inflation rate as that employed 20 years ago, the actual current number is near a whopping 10 percent. Anyone that shops for food, buys gasoline or purchases almost any other good or service (except, perhaps electronics) knows that some inflation is occurring. Few know the actual rate.
Meanwhile the federal government and the Federal Reserve both claim that inflation is virtually non-existent. They have denied any increase in Social Security benefits to retirees based on numbers that both know are fraudulent.
They're using skewed numbers based on a purposefully misleading method of calculating the number.
As explained by Williams the "Unemployment Rate reflects current unemployment reporting methodology adjusted for long-term discouraged workers, who were defined out of official existence in 1994. That estimate is added to the BLS estimate of U-6 unemployment, which includes short-term discouraged workers."
The result is an unemployment picture that equals the worst of the Great Depression. Using the 1994 standard that was gradually tinkered with to make everything look rosier than it really is (if 10 percent unemployment can be considered rosy), the real seasonally adjusted unemployment rate today hovers at 23 percent. Of course depending on the region, the demographics and the industry, some unemployment is actually pushing over 40 percent.
Dismal dollar value
The dollar is not just weak, it's on life support. No wonder so many investors, companies and countries have fled to gold and other precious metals. Williams uses the actual 1985 methodology of calculating the value of the dollar and the 1985 value as the benchmark.
The horrifying truth is that since 1985 the dollar has lost about 50 percent of its value.
Those in the know (and their numbers are growing) realize this number is the real one. This explains the increasing pressure among countries in the world market to dump the dollar as the world trade currency and why more international banks have recently called for a world currency to replace the dollar.
Some Nobel Prize economists have recently warned of approaching hyper-inflation. With the real inflation already in double-digit territory, hyper-inflation could turn the United States into a banana republic.
The media is eager to report that, although sluggish, the economy has responded to Washington's stimulus package with a modest 2 to 3 percent growth of the Gross Domestic Product.
The media is populated with either fools or liars.
As Williams' damning chart clearly reveals, the actual annual GDP growth is far from that which has been reported. In fact, the "growth" is not even in the positive territory. The economy is still mired in contraction as the unemployment rate swings higher.
Williams explains, the "GDP reflects the inflation-adjusted, or real, year-to-year GDP change, adjusted for distortions in government inflation usage and methodological changes that have resulted in a built-in upside bias to official reporting."
The numbers are terrifying. During 2009 the GDP collapsed by a negative 6 percent and even now is running at a negative 1 to 2 percent.
No growth exists at all.
E-mail the URL of this article to everyone you know—Democrat or Republican, it doesn't matter. After all, no one worried about politics aboard the sinking Titanic did they?
And if the USA goes down, everyone goes down with it.
* John Williams' bio: Walter J. "John" Williams was born in 1949. He received an A.B. in Economics, cum laude, from Dartmouth College in 1971, and was awarded a M.B.A. from Dartmouth's Amos Tuck School of Business Administration in 1972, where he was named an Edward Tuck Scholar.
Articles for October 12, 2010 | Articles for October 13, 2010 | Articles for October 14, 2010