Saturday July 11, 2020
SNc Channels:



Oct-17-2007 07:21printcomments

Keizer May Intervene With Oregon Voter Passed Law

Chuck Lee of Keizer, Oregon needs to mind his own business!

(KEIZER, Ore.) - This ex Keizer city councilman is all up in arms because a homeowner with a fence that borders McNary High School property is a fully legal grower for the Oregon Medical Marijuana Program (OMMP) and was victimized by a burglar who stole some of his entirely legal property... harvest from the marijuana plants he grows for four program participants.

If that which was stolen was almost anything else Mr Beasley, the homeowner, had owned the focus would be where it rightfully belongs... innocent homeowner victimized by burglar, what shall we do to crack down on this kind of crime?

But because Mr Beasley is a legal marijuana grower for legal participants in the legal Oregon Medical Marijuana Program (note all the references to LEGAL?) according to Mr Lee the issue is not the city's failure to protect Mr Beasley's property and legal rights. No, according to Mr Lee the issue is to prevent Mr Beasley (and anyone like him) from engaging in entirely legal activities with entirely legal property in his own home on his own property.

I think it is abundantly clear that although the Oregon Medical Marijuana law was passed resoundingly by Oregon's voters not once but TWICE, that Mr Lee is an opponent of the law and likely voted against it both times. This is what I call Sore Loser Syndrome. His side lost the votes so he goes about trying to harass those who won, trying to make it hard if not impossible for them to do what the law allows.

Mr Beasley did not advertise his grow spot, and once it was attacked he put up tarps to obscure the plants from school view. Mr Beasley is not setting up a "Pot Stand" at the fence selling through the cyclone barrier dime bags to the student body at McNary HS.

What should be happening is the school should be taking steps to control the illegal activities of their students against law abiding citizens such as Mr Beasley.

It is interesting that this is not the tack that Mr Lee has chosen.

Interesting indeed.

Mr Lee claims he is not against the OMMP yet wants to ban grow sites from within 1000 feet of a school. Considering all the public and private schools in the Salem/Keizer area and how spread out they are this 'simple rule' of his would mean that well over 75% of homes would not be able to be used. And of the few that would remain available all opponents of the OMMP would need to do is start up schools in strategically located sites to pretty much eliminate any and all potential grow sites. And without grow sites those who under the OMMP have every right to their medicine will find the medicine nearly impossible to get.

And of course it is an incredibly small step to go from no grow sites within 1000 feet of a school to no use of the medication within 1000 feet of schools.

Which would for all intents and purposes kill the OMMP. Which is clearly what, in his incremental manner, Mr Lee seeks to do.

Keizer police spokesman Capt. Jeff Kuhns has said "that although police found that the medical marijuana provider was in compliance with state law, he has received feedback from many Keizer residents about the issue." I am not surprised he has received feedback. There were many who voted against the laws that produced the OMMP and I think it is quite obvious that Mr Lee riled up opponents to give their 'feedback'.

As Mr Lee stated, he "wrote the letter as a private citizen, submitted the letter to city officials before news of the theft was made public."

He said he heard about the grower "more than three weeks ago."

How interesting. He heard about the grower more than three weeks ago. One might even suggest that the burglary might have been formented by Mr Lee or one of his OMMP opposing cronies to bring the issue into the spotlight so that he could make his play to harass not only this one legal grower, Mr Beasley, but any and every other legal grower as well.

What Mr Lee wants is to treat LEGAL growers of a LEGAL product the same as those who possess and deliver ILLEGAL drugs.

I presume anyone who voted against the medical marijuana laws will support his actions and those who voted in favor will oppose his actions. But the state government should oppose his actions because his actions go against not only the laws of the state of Oregon but also the resounding decision of the Oregon voters not once but TWICE!

It is unacceptable to allow sore losers in initiative or legislative campaigns to undermine the passed laws by enacting ordinances or other obstacles which only seek to harass those who are just attempting to follow the laws.

If Mr Lee is afraid of Mr Beasley or other growers illegally selling to high school students then they can monitor for such. It is already a crime for him to do so.

But the proposal of Mr Lee does nothing but put an odious and undue burden upon those legally participatring in the OMMP. And whether you personally approve of or oppose the law it IS THE LAW. That should mean something.

Mr Lee calls it a 'loophole' that Mr Beasley is able to grow legally on his home property. Does Mr Lee know what the definition of a 'loophole' is? It implies being able to do something unintended. What unintended action is Mr Beasley doing? What difference does it make where the grow sites are so long as they are not making the harvests available to those not legally allowed to access them? There is no 'loophole'.

There is just the sophistry of an OMMP opponent seeking to use this as a wedge to attack and harass the OMMP as well as its entirely legal and law abiding growers and participants. Homeowners should be able to participate in any legal activity they wish on or in their own property.

Mr Beasley has been growing in that spot for nearly 8 months. Other than the burglary there have been no incidents. Mr Beasley, on his own, put up the tarps. But he is still attacked by the likes of Mr Lee and Mr Kuhns as if it were he, the legal and law abiding citizen victim of the burglar, who was the criminal instead of the burglar.

Mr Lee wants to 'prevent something like that from happening again'. Unfortunately he is not referring to the burglary for which he clearly could not possibly care less about, but instead he is referring to the entirely legal and law abiding activity of Mr Beasley growing the medical marijuana for several patients who need it and who are legally entitled to it.

Mr Lee threatens that if his local efforts fail that he will seek a statewide version.

It is clear that this has nothig to do with 'protecting kids' and everything to do with Mr Lee being a sore loser on the medical marijuana issue so he will do anything and everything he can to harass, intimidate and obstruct legal and law abiding citizens from accessing that which the law allows them.

That is simply wrong.

The schools need to keep their students under control. The police need to deal with burglars who try and take property, yes including legally grown medical marijuana, instead of looking for ways to harass, intimidate or obstruct legal law abiding citizens engaged in legal law abiding activities.

Comments Leave a comment on this story.

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

bloggie October 23, 2009 8:24 pm (Pacific time)

A theif is a theif. The law should apply, but if Mr. Beasly grew the medicine illegally as OMMP regulations may forbid, then Mr. Beasley should loose his OMMP Card to grow or possess medical marijuana..OMMP should police it's members...ON the other side we have a theif, and a theif is a theif.. I don't care if the Mr. Beasley was stupid or not about growing, the thiefs should be put in jail...

aaron April 25, 2008 12:09 am (Pacific time)

i have met mr. beasley before. that guy is always doing and selling all kinds of drugs. i guarantee that guy has seedy people over and brought this on himself.

Chris April 8, 2008 12:29 pm (Pacific time)

What I didn't hear anyone state is that it is illegal to grow, even with a medical card, plants in public view. Because it was in public view, the accused cardholder is in violation and therefore shouldn't receive any help from the authorities. In fact according to Oregon law, he should be punished as if he didn't have a card. As a card holder myself, idiots like him give the program a bad name.

Festus October 19, 2007 12:10 am (Pacific time)

Mr. Beasley sounds like a tard. I am glad his plants were stolen. Anyone dumb enough to grow them in plain view ought to have his head examined! He was just advertising to have them stolen by some HS kids. Hopefully they had a good party on Beasley's dime!

danny October 18, 2007 2:35 am (Pacific time)

Legalise it

bamboozler October 17, 2007 9:00 pm (Pacific time)

Any other kind of theft would be dealt with the same way (they write it down) by the "fuzz" for sure, but it never would have made it to the news. I bet somebody at McNary is already bragging about it! dp

Jeff October 17, 2007 9:45 am (Pacific time)

You are so right! Lee's purpose is to complicate the marijuana laws because he is still of the "Reefer Madness" frame of mind. That is, one who is oppossed to marijuana in any form for any reason. This is a prejudiced, ignorant, fearful, uninformed opinion, and there are many other people out there who would like to see marijuana kept illegal because they still believe it is harmful to your health. WRONG! Marijuana's medical efficacy has been proven by scientist's, doctor's, and people who have used marijuana for an extended period of time to learn that marijuana is more healthful than not, even by smoking it. Plus the youth of today knows the truth about the use of marijuana and it's health effects or problems it might cause or heal. I smoked pot for 27 years then quit for 10 years with no withdrawal effects at all. It didn't even bother my sleep cycle. So although I agree with Mr. Beasly putting up the tarps, Lee is trying, once again, to make marijuana a political issue when it belongs a medical issue.

batboysmother October 17, 2007 8:04 am (Pacific time)

Why do we seem to long for the attitudes and ideals of the dark ages? What the hell happened to the "enlightened" generation of babyboomers? Geeze...

[Return to Top]
©2020 All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of

Articles for October 16, 2007 | Articles for October 17, 2007 | Articles for October 18, 2007
Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin

Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.

The NAACP of the Willamette Valley

Donate to and help us keep the news flowing! Thank you.