Monday June 25, 2018
SNc Channels:



Jan-15-2012 17:17printcomments

Letter: Is the Navy Trying to Keep the Camp Lejeune Investigation Secret?

“The military and civilian families of Camp Lejeune deserve to know nothing short of the whole truth” - Angela Canterbury, POGO’s director of public policy

Camp Lejeune cleanup efforts
Image courtesy: slagheap

(WASHINGTON D.C.) - POGO received a curious letter today revealing that the Department of Navy seems to be putting pressure on another government agency to stymie its release of information related to the water contamination scandal at Camp Lejeune.

Camp Lejeune will likely go down in history as the stage of one of the worst toxic contaminations in the country—and one of the most shameful cover-ups by the Marine Corps. Between 1957 and 1987, as many as one million Marines at Camp Lejeune and their family members used and ingested water contaminated by extremely toxic organic compounds.

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) was mandated by Congress to conduct environmental and health investigations into this horrific incident. A report is anticipated in the near future. In a letter given to POGO by an anonymous source, and dated January 5, the Department of Navy told the agency that the “security environment” has “significantly changed” since the Camp Lejeune investigation began.

“I request that we work together to review our public domain materials and take appropriate steps to protect critical infrastructure information,” wrote Marine Corps General J.A. Kessler in the letter.

Kessler goes on to outline exactly what kind of information ATSDR should “review carefully.” This includes location information for active and inactive potable water wells, lines, treatment plants and storage tanks.

The Navy is asking ATSDR to take the military’s security into account, but we're concerned the Navy's pressure is really an attempt to block release of information that could have great public interest. After all, ATSDR has been doing oversight—in particular, health assessments and health study activities—that could implicate the U.S. Marine Corps and the Department of Navy in wrongdoing. This raises questions as to what interests the Navy is seeking to protect.

Notably, the Navy makes no mention of the “public interest balancing test” now required by the language introduced in December by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Representative Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) to a Department of Defense FOIA exemption passed late last month in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012.

According to the new exemption for certain “Critical Infrastructure Security Information,” the Secretary of Defense must consider whether the public interest in disclosure of information outweighs the government’s need to withhold the information, when evaluating FOIA requests.

“If the Navy is successful, it could set a very dangerous precedent for other agencies to withhold federal scientific and environmental information from the public, by letting agencies invoke unsubstantiated national security concerns,” said Angela Canterbury, POGO’s director of public policy.

Canterbury urges ATSDR to release all information surrounding the investigation allowed under the law, and asks Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to ensure that the Navy and every other department and agency under DoD are appropriately using the public interest balancing test.

“The military and civilian families of Camp Lejeune deserve to know nothing short of the whole truth” she said.

Dana Liebelson is the Beth Daley Impact Fellow


Comments Leave a comment on this story.

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

Frank Vera January 22, 2012 7:36 am (Pacific time)

George Air Force Base, CA

Did the Department of Defense, Army, and Air Force misreprese­nt the nature and extent of the contaminat­ion at George AFB? I believe that the answer is yes.

The Air Force is/was required by law to deny the existence of any environmen­tal contaminat­ion that is/was the result of classified activities­.

The DoD and Air Force inserted an interestin­g clause in the “Federal Facility Agreement for George AFB” that gives them the right to withhold records [pertainin­g to contaminat­ion] at the property.

The Air Force admits that it routinely withheld records about contaminat­ion from regulators­, contractor­s, and the public. “Buried Radioactiv­e Weapons Maintenanc­e Waste”

Furthermor­e, The EPA and the Government Accountabi­lity Office found that the Air Force has no idea of what radioisoto­pes, the amount it buried, or the locations of the radioactiv­e waste dumps on its bases. “Nuclear Regulation - The Military Would Benefit From a Comprehens­ive Waste Disposal Program”, “Better Data Needed For Radioactiv­ely Contaminat­ed Defense Sites”, “Lost AEC Records”

Dr. Sabol was the Chief Environmen­tal Officer for George AFB. However, I can find no evidence that Dr. Sabol was interviewe­d by any of the contractor­s involved in the Installati­on Restoratio­n Program (IRP) or by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) for the Health Assessment of George AFB, and none of his environmen­tal reports / investigat­ions are in the George AFB Administra­tive Record (AR).

Frank Vera

[Return to Top]
©2018 All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of

Articles for January 14, 2012 | Articles for January 15, 2012 | Articles for January 16, 2012
Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin

The NAACP of the Willamette Valley

Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar