Saturday August 15, 2020
SNc Channels:



May-01-2010 04:13printcomments

Testing the Limits of Freedom of Speech: Ernst Zundel Speaks Out

Foreign Policy Journal's exclusive interview with one of Europe's most well-known political prisoners.

Ernst Zundel
Ernst Zundel

(TEHRAN) - Ernst Zundel is a German author and historian who has spent seven years of his life behind bars as a result of expressing his controversial viewpoints and opinions. He is a revisionist who has denied the Holocaust as described by most historians. He has been one of the most prominent political prisoners in Europe and has been jailed in three countries on two continents.

After his arrest in the U.S. in 2003, he was deported to Canada, where he was kept in prison as “a threat to the national security” for two years. After deportation to Germany in March 2005, he was convicted and sentenced in 2007 to five additional years of imprisonment on charges of holocaust denial. He was finally released on March 1, 2010.

This is the first interview Ernst Zundel has given since his release, published in the Foreign Policy Journal.

Firstly, I would like to extend my congratulations on your recent release. Were you ever mistreated or subject to any type of mental or physical punishment in breach of international conventions?

My entire treatment these past seven years by those arresting me, trying and convicting me, and keeping me in prison has been in brutal breach of international conventions. I was arrested in broad daylight on American soil by officials of the U.S. government who acted as hit squads for a nefarious lobby. There was no arrest warrant. I was not read my rights. I was whisked away in handcuffs without being allowed to get my wallet, to call my attorney, to be allowed to make my case before an American Immigration Judge or even hug my wife goodbye.

I was incarcerated in six different prisons on two continents in three countries—the USA, Canada, and Germany—without relief of any kind. In effect, I have had 10 percent of my life stolen from me – and for what “crime”? For having “overstayed my U.S. visa”?

Throughout my imprisonment, basic human rights principles were trampled underfoot repeatedly and with impunity. The worst prisons were the Canadian detention centers at Thorold, Ontario and at Toronto West, where I was held for two long years in isolation cells, ice-cold in the winter, no shoes or socks allowed. The electric light in these cells, bright enough to be able to read, was kept on 24 hours a day. Through a glass slot in the door I was checked every 20 minutes, and my activities were meticulously noted by the guards: one sheet for every day. No dignity, no privacy. My toothbrush was kept in a plastic bin in a hall. I was not allowed to speak to other prisoners.

Bed sheets were changed only after three months. No pillows. No chairs. When I wrote to my wife or to my attorneys, I had to sit on a makeshift pile of my court transcripts. No radio, no television, not even an electrical outlet to sharpen my pencils. No ball point pens, only pencil stubs, cut in half with a saw. No spoons, forks, or knives were permitted; only a white plastic spoon with a fork called a “spork” that had to be returned every time at the end of the meal. With very few exceptions when furtive guards showed me some kindness away from the surveillance cameras, I was treated as though I was the worst of criminals. That’s Canada for you, where I have lived and worked without a criminal record for more than 40 years.

It was somewhat better, but not much, in the United States. In Germany, it was quite a bit better in terms of the basic necessities, but personal mail was routinely withheld – 1,700 letters for up to five years – even after I forced a court to order that it be given to me. My so-called trial in Mannheim was a political show trial in the Stalinist mode in that my guilt was a foregone conclusion. I requested that exculpatory exhibits be allowed as validation for what I believed and had written and said. No meaningful defense was allowed. I could not put on record any forensic evidence, any historical documents, or even expert witnesses... That very request to be allowed to offer evidence was held to be a new offense of criminal behavior and could have resulted in new criminal charges – as were, in fact, lodged against my lawyers during that very trial who tried to overcome these restrictions.

Along with the rest of EU members, Germany regularly criticizes other countries for violations of free speech and human rights. However, your case demonstrated the emptiness of such claims within Europe. What’s your take on that? Is Europe really a utopia of liberty and freedom of speech?

Most European countries have only selected free speech for officially approved and sanctioned views on history. Almost all EU countries have laws in place that restrict freedom of speech under the guise of one fig leaf or other, such as the prevention of racist or neo-Nazi activities. The state decides selectively who is and what is racist. These laws are hypocritical, in Germany’s case superseding even their own Basic Law.

Dissidents are allowed very little opportunity to be read or heard in the mainstream corporate media channels of the West. The control mechanisms of the press are many, often subtle but widely understood and obeyed – fear of loss of jobs, diminished circulation, the withholding of government advertisements etc. There is no longer unrestricted freedom in any Western country, not even in the U.S. with its wonderful Constitution and Amendments such as the Bill of Rights.

Allow me here to point out to your readers the outline of a censorship practice known by its neutral term “rendition”, but more honestly defined as political kidnappings to force the silencing of dissident speech or alternate thoughts. Renditions in the West are ever more frequently practiced not only against alleged “terrorist suspects” but against ordinary political activists and writers whose viewpoints are frowned upon by such outfits as AIPAC and similar Zionist lobby and interest groups, B’nai Brith, the Canadian Jewish Congress etc.

In order to spell out what I can only describe to you in broad strokes, I’d like to briefly shed light on the period preceding my arrest in the U.S. and Canada; the conniving and the similarity in other cases like mine, where an innocuous or alleged infraction is used as a fig leaf to silence a political opponent.

Viet Dinh, a Georgetown University law professor and director of their Asian Law and Policy Studies Program who helped craft the Patriot Act, put it succinctly, as reported in an American publication called Wired that deals with freedom of speech on the net. That interview reads:

Wired News: An estimated 5,000 people have been subjected to detention since 9/11. Of those, only five — three noncitizens and two citizens — were charged with terrorism-related crimes and one was convicted. How do we justify such broad-sweeping legislation that has resulted in very few terrorist-related convictions?

Dinh: I’ve heard the 5,000 number. The official numbers released from the Department of Justice indicate approximately 500 persons have been charged with immigration violations and have been deported who have been of interest to the 9/11 investigation.

It may well be that a number of citizens were not charged with terrorism-related crimes, but they need not be. Where the department has suspected people of terrorism, it will prosecute those persons for other violations of law, rather than wait for a terrorist conspiracy to fully develop and risk the potential that that conspiracy will be missed and thereby sacrificing innocent American lives in the process.

This is exactly what happened to me. The initial reason given was an alleged immigration infraction – namely a “visa overstay”. I was no terrorist; I was a dissident writer. My political detractors knew perfectly well that I was in America legally, awaiting adjustment of status due to my marriage to an American citizen. I was in Immigration Adjustment of Status proceedings, meticulously following all the prerequisite steps. I was living openly in a rural area in Tennessee and was listed by address in the local telephone book. The U.S. government had given me a Social Security number, a work permit, a document that allowed me to leave the country and return unmolested. I had undergone and passed an FBI check and a health clearance. The only last step missing was a personal interview by an immigration official to ascertain a valid marriage to my American citizen wife.

We had been notified in writing that this interview could take as long as three years, and that no status report would be given. We were patiently waiting for that last step, a routine interview with an immigration official. Our immigration attorney had requested such an interview in writing – twice! Under oath, he testified that he had written those letters. These letters have mysteriously disappeared from our immigration file. When I was arrested, it was claimed that I had negligently “missed a hearing” which gave them grounds for an arrest due to a visa overstay. In other words, a simple bureaucratic loophole was found or fabricated that has cost me seven years of my life.

What happened to me in the context of a deliberate state policy of deception has also happened to others. Similar ruses via false accusations were used in cases like Germar Rudolf, likewise married to an American citizen, El Masri of Germany, Maher Arar of Canada, Gerd Honsik of Spain, Siegfried Verbeke of Belgium, David Irving, and now Bishop Williamson of England, to name only a few individuals who were caught between the grindstones of a criminal policy possible only under the Patriot Act in the U.S. and similar legal instruments in other countries. Embedded in that background of a widespread covert policy and practice to force political conformity, my case makes eminent sense. We are no longer dealing with an aberration. These extrajudicial renditions give 9/11 and the Patriot Act a new light as a global policy instrument of brutal censorship of unpopular thinkers and writers.

The thrust of a prestigious publication such as yours would normally deal with the policies of foreign governments, renditions, kidnappings, and incarcerations not only of foreign enemies but, as in the case of Vanunu, an Israeli-born-and-raised atomic scientist. He was no neo-Nazi, no racist, no Holocaust Denier, yet he was relentlessly pursued by the Mossad and ultimately kidnapped and jailed for 18 years.

The patterns of the breaking of international law and conventions, the use of false identities, and the brazen practice of breaking and entering by spy and intelligence agencies, etc. – these criminal activities are daily in the news. This sets the stage and makes my case a logical progression of an old, established policy, with this one difference: we are no longer talking about hunting and kidnapping alleged “Nazi war criminals” like Eichmann or stone-throwing Palestinians or even “Arab terrorists”, but instead the targeting of writers and other political dissidents in Western countries calling themselves “democracies”.

My story does not even end there. In my case, my “Holocaust Denier” profile was convenient, but passé. It was not even, as is so commonly and falsely claimed, “Denial of the Holocaust” or even more bizarre, my “visa overstay”! I was told what actually happened by a friend of ours with high-level UN connections. In his own words: “It was the Blue Booklet that did it! That’s when it was decided at the very highest level to take you out for good!”

Here is what happened, briefly: In the early months post-9/11 my wife, an avid Internetter, discovered a compelling research document entitled Stranger than Fiction: An Independent Investigation of 9/11 and the War on Terrorism by Anonymous, 11-11-02. She gave it to me over breakfast. I read it, found it interesting, and ran a few copies off on my printer for people on my mailing list. I did not write that lavishly footnoted paper. I did not research it. I merely copied it. Somebody must have concluded that I, with my background of thorough forensic investigations in other areas, showed more than ordinary interest in 9/11 as a potential political false flag common in intelligence agency operations!

During my trial in Mannheim, ostensibly for “Holocaust Denial”, portions of my monthly newsletter, where I mentioned this booklet and the 9/11 topic, were referenced by the prosecution as criminal offenses. Only after it became clear that I welcomed the opportunity to have my attorneys present forensic evidence of a potential 9/11 cover-up were those portions of the accusation against me hastily dropped, and my trial became a “Holocaust Denial” show trial in the traditional Stalinist mode, “… accuse wildly but don’t allow a defense!”

As we later found out through various freedom of information requests in various countries, there was in place for years a deliberate, convoluted plan to arrest and detain me under false pretenses so as to take me out and put me behind bars.

I mention this only as an overarching, logical example as to how diabolically clever my political opponents are in using the accusation of “Holocaust Denial” and persecution of Holocaust Revisionists as arrows in their arsenal of weaponry to shore up, consolidate, and protect their deceptively acquired power and influence.

What’s the reality behind Holocaust? Didn’t it happen at all? What about people such as Elie Wiesel, Thomas Blatt, Wladyslaw Bartoszewski and Leopold Engleitner who are Holocaust survivors and describe their own accounts of those painful days, when they personally witnessed the heart-rending demise of their parents in concentration camps and bone-crushing machines. How should we resolve these contradictions?

I will not answer this question. I would risk five more years in jail if I answered these questions honestly and truthfully. However, in the age of the Internet, others less known than I am find ways to simplify a painful, multifaceted problem, as the cartoon [Prevent Holocaust, Bomb Iran by Carlos Latuff] makes plain.

Many people of other countries have come to the categorical conclusion that the Western world is a beacon of liberty and unrestricted freedom of speech. But it sometimes seems that the reality is something else, and that people can be easily prosecuted merely for publishing views that are disliked. The booklet you published, Did Six Million Really Die?, is an example. What do you think?

Here is just one more example of what I already outlined above: We have faxes and other documents that prove on official embassy letterhead that the much vaunted and propagandized U.S. Judiciary has run interference for these kidnappers and renditioners via behind-the-scenes ex parte communication, thus engaging in a cover-up and whitewash worse than the ones practiced by those the U.S. government always blames for human rights violations in their hypocritical press campaigns, like against China in Tibet, Lukashenko in Belarus, Putin in Moscow and, of course, Iran during the recent so-called Green Revolution.

Many Zionist websites have introduced you as a white supremacist. Is that a fair characterization?

This claim is a convenient character assassination technique. I have never been a white supremacist and have stated so for decades, publicly, in countless interviews, newsletters, speeches, broadcasts, etc. It is my opponents’ modus operandi to broad-brush complex issues by politically expedient demonization.

You’re opposed to the regime of Israel because of its discriminatory and atrocious approach against the nation of Palestine. You consider yourself a pacifist who advocates stability and peace; aren’t these beliefs incompatible with your viewpoint regarding Hitler, who is internationally considered to be a notorious dictator and relentless killer? How can your peace-seeking stance come together with your approval of Hitler?

I cannot answer this question due to legal restraints. An honest and complete answer would land me in jail as a re-offender very quickly. Implicit in your question is the toxic image of me that my detractors would like you to have. To be called a Nazi is worse than being called a leper. For decades I have been on the receiving end of just such a targeted character assassination campaign. I have been jailed many times - not for advocating an ideology - but for expressing a dissident, alternative viewpoint on many topics, including Adolf Hitler’s role in history. Revisionism is not an ideology. It is merely a scientific method of re-examining historical events and of trying to understand the movers and shakers who made history a footnote to their personalities.

Let me answer your question this way: I have always abhorred any kind of violence in the pursuit of political goals. By anyone! Politically, I was and am a pacifist, much in the Gandhi style. I advocate a sober, neutral look at history, including the period known as the Third Reich. The peoples of the world, regardless of what system of government they live under, owe it to themselves to emancipate themselves of the simplistic images of propaganda and deceit posing as history.

On May 1995, your Toronto residence was the target of an arson attack which resulted in $400,000 worth of damage. A few days later, some of your extremist opponents were caught trying to break into your property. Again a few days later, you received a parcel bomb which the Toronto police detonated. Have you ever tried to lodge a complaint against them? Have they ever been lawfully sentenced?

This is the flip side of some of the questions above. While I have never advocated or engaged in violence, egregious acts of violence have been repeatedly practiced on me, of which the political kidnapping in 2003 was merely the latest. As to the fire and the bomb, no, nothing was ever resolved. The police apprehended the bomb builders and senders, but the charges laid were stayed. There seems to have been no political will at the highest levels of the Canadian government. There was no political coin to be garnered by prosecuting Jewish arsonists, who even confessed to the deed.

Do you differentiate between the Zionists and Jews as the followers of a divine, monotheistic religion?

Yes, the two are totally different. Some Orthodox Jews who are united against Zionism, such as the Neturei Karta, believe that also. They know the godfathers of Communism and Zionism followed identical policies. The guiding spirit behind the two systems is the same. Neturei Karta rabbis attended the 2006 Teheran Conference sponsored by your President in an attempt to distance themselves from what they consider to be a dangerous atheist clique in the pursuit of illegal politics of conquest of which they want no part.

The mainstream corporate media, while having already vilified you, remained silent about your release. What do you think about this? Are you going to continue your ideological path or would you prefer to keep a low profile and forget about the intellectual activities?

Ironically, that was exactly what I intended to do when I moved to Tennessee and married Ingrid; keeping a low profile and turning to private endeavors such as my love for art and music. I felt that my revisionist outreach was finished, concluded to my inner satisfaction. Let others read both sides and then judge for themselves. All the arguments, all the information needed on the Holocaust is out there, on the Internet, in tens of thousands of websites, all for the taking. How often do you have to dig up an archeological site to find yet one more bone, yet one more implicating shard? My wife likes to say that you don’t have to eat a camel to know what a cutlet tastes like. I was quite ready to retire and satisfy my creative needs and desires. I could leave the political mopping-up activities for others to complete. But could my political opponents bring themselves, as rational people might have, to likewise call it quits? No; that is simply not in their nature.

As you point out so cogently, a powerful vilification campaign is still going full blast. It keeps my name in the media for people to decide for themselves who I am. Upon my release, my wife has collected thousands and thousands of letters from readers, only three of which were negative! Not a bad record, of the millions of dollars spent and millions of words dispersed in an attempt to paint me as as a devil with horns.

Let me ask you – would your prestigious publication have cared to interview me if you thought that I deserved the label of Evil Incarnate?

[FPJ's editor note: The views and beliefs of Ernst Zundel are his own, and not those of Foreign Policy Journal. It is the policy of FPJ to uphold the principle of freedom of speech, which means freedom to say things that others may find despicable. It is otherwise a meaningless principle. It is also the position of FPJ that both sides to a story deserve to be heard. It's up to readers to draw their own conclusions and make their own judgments.]

The latest writer to join's team; Kourosh Ziabari is an Iranian media correspondent, freelance journalist and the author of Book 7+1. He is a contributing writer for websites and magazines in the Netherlands, Canada, Italy, Hong Kong, Bulgaria, South Korea, Belgium, Germany, the U.K. and the U.S. He was once a member of Stony Brook University Publications’ editorial team and Media Left magazine’s contributing writer, as well as a contributing writer for Finland’s Award-winning Ovi Magazine. As a young Iranian journalist, he has been interviewed and quoted by several mainstream mediums, including BBC World Service, PBS Media Shift, the Media Line network, Deutsch Financial Times and L.A. Times. Currently, he works for the Foreign Policy Journal as a media correspondent. He is a member of Tlaxcala Translators Network for Linguistic Diversity and World Student Community for Sustainable Development. You can write to Kourosh Ziabari at:

Comments Leave a comment on this story.

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

Natalie November 3, 2010 7:41 pm (Pacific time)

This is why dissident is a nice word in my dictionary: ( definition from the Oxford Dictionary): adj. Disagreeing or differing (in opinion, character, etc.); at variance, different. (b) Dissenting in ecclesiastical matters. (c) Disagreeing in political matters; voicing political dissent, usu. in a totalitarian state. B. n. One who disagrees; a dissentient. (b) One who dissents from the established or dominant form of religion; a dissenter. ( c) spec. Under the kingdom of Poland, the name given to Protestants, members of the Greek Church, and other Christians, not of the established Roman Catholic Church. (d) In political contexts, one who openly opposes the policies of the government or ruling party, esp. in a totalitarian system.

Natalie November 3, 2010 4:50 pm (Pacific time)

Anon: I use "so-called" because it's a nice word in my dictionary, and Herr Zundel is not a nice person. Also, I apologize for generalizing too much. You obviously don’t belong to people who “didn’t understand Hitler”. As we say “have a drum on your neck and a flag in your hands” to tell everybody about how much you adore Hitler. I guess, there’re still people that believe that Stalin and Hitler were the most wonderful people on Earth – “Twix – the sweet couple” - too sweet to swallow for me. I can tell you about crimes of the "people that conquered half the world" in “war zones” all day long. It’s out there in the open- Afghanistan, Chechnya, Poland,etc. How d’you say it… It ain’t pretty? Exactly, it’s not pretty at all. Re Vlad’s post: Anon: if that’s your post, don’t hide behind that name. No “Russian” speaks that way. If they love –they love, if they hate - well, it shows, too. I can respect a man with the opposite view on the subject, but I can’t respect hiding cowards. Sorry, never could. Oh, BTW, re wrong words: people, the word that you use as the worst Russian curse word means nothing else but “grandma” and is used every single minute by kids, as you can imagine. So, get your education from Hollywood, but get a nice “curse words dictionary” or something because nobody understands why you use it. Really.

Anonymous November 2, 2010 8:30 pm (Pacific time)

@Natalie "If I'm expected to praise this so-called dissident I expect to see what he wrote and said." According to wordnet, "dissident" has the following definitons: dissident adj 1: characterized by departure from accepted beliefs or standards [syn: {heretical}, {heterodox}] 2: disagreeing, especially with a majority [syn: {dissentient}, {dissenting(a)}] n : a person who dissents from some established policy [syn: {dissenter}, {protester}, {objector}, {contestant}] So does you calling Zundel a "so-called dissident" mean you do not agree with these definitions? Because Zundel clearly was punished for the "departure from accepted beliefs" and he surely is "disagreeing, especially with a majority" about certain aspects of history, which are interwoven with todays politics. Therefore, the word "dissenter" fits perfectly to describe his status. "Good name for Germans starts with denying to kill people? Really? It starts with apologies, Vlad. And Germans that have brains, thank God, apologized for their wrong doings." Being a German that was born after 1945, just as Zundel, I simply can't see for what we need to apologise for, even if the claims of the Jews would be true, since I can't be held responsible for something which somebody else did, and much less for something which was done before I even were born. And for the same reason it is not possible for me or Zundel to deny the "Holocaust" since one can only deny something of which s/he has direct, actual knowledge. "Just wondering... do you ever visit your ancestors graves that fought against Hitler?" Just wondering... did it ever occur to you that you and your ancestors have been lied to? "He also just wanted to bring some civilization to my Land." Are you kidding me? Do you really believe the propaganda lie that Hitler wanted to conquer the world? This lie is so ridicoulous coming from the mouth of people who in actual fact had conquered at least half the world at this time and whose soldiers set foot on German territory for the second time! "Nobody understood him." Well, actually the overwhelming majority of Germans not only understood but also loved him, because they knew first-hand what great thing he has done for Germany and the German people. "That's why he ordered to throw little babies in wells, put metal sticks in alive human beings ears and pull it out from another side. Never heard of it? No wonder." Oh, I have heard even more ridiculous things than those you mentioned. Like: The Nazis made lampshades, shrunken heads, soap and other items out of humans. Or: The Nazis have torn apart children in the air. Or: The Nazis have killed 6 million Jews in gaschambers etc. Actually, this kind of atrocity propaganda directed against Germany is nothing new. In WW1 they for example were accused to have cut off the hands of Belgian babies, cut of the breast of nuns, made soap from enemy soldiers etc. The fact that you and others still believe in the garbage that was spread during and shortly after the war shows how deep the world has sunk!

Abd el hafiz May 7, 2010 1:38 am (Pacific time)

Is that true that Zundel hates Muslims too?

gp May 5, 2010 3:18 pm (Pacific time)

I followed Sam Bolivar to a truly hateful website. As Sam said this was a "truly fine article", wanted to see what else he reads. Sam likes violent hateful things and not informed and well written articles. This is NOT a fine article. There is no information here, only murky references.

Natalie May 4, 2010 11:14 am (Pacific time)

Good; that was the only decent option, anyway. Reading doesn't mean instantly agreeing. I read it too, so? Studying Marx's works for a year didn't make me a marxist either.

Natalie May 4, 2010 2:35 am (Pacific time)

To everybody still feeling good about praising Herr Zundel after watching the link, Hail Hitler! Long Live Pacifists! Special thanks to Tim King.

Tim King: I plead the fifth; my understanding is that the article was about Germany's laws and the sentence he received.  It is a story according to our usage page, that many people are reading. 

Natalie May 4, 2010 2:04 am (Pacific time)

Vlad: I can't thank you enough for that link. I admit to be complitely uninterested in searching for his name on my own. Now I know why there's only a nice pic with a smily old defenceless man. He absolutely COULD say, without being sent again to jail, what were his charges. If I'm expected to praise this so-called dissident I expect to see what he wrote and said. And he did say. Not only asked, Vlad. Good name for Germans starts with denying to kill people? Really? It starts with apologies, Vlad. And Germans that have brains, thank God, apologized for their wrong doings. Just wondering... do you ever visit your ancestors graves that fought against Hitler? Do you have a habit of talking to them and letting them know what a nice Hitler's follower you became? Oh, yes, Hitler was a great artist. He loved music. He built MULTIPLE HOLLYWOOD STAGES for ungreatful jews. He also just wanted to bring some civilization to my Land. Nobody understood him. Poor thing. That's why he ordered to throw little babies in wells, put metal sticks in alive human beings ears and pull it out from another side. Never heard of it? No wonder. If this author shares the views of Ernst Zundel, I'll just skip his articles. And that would be the only one ever.

Vlad May 3, 2010 10:16 pm (Pacific time)

More information about Herr Zundel. Zum 71. Geburtstag von Ernst Zündel (To the moderators, this is just a 10 minute video on YouTube detailing the "crimes" of Ernst Zundel. This is not self-promotion or anything like that. I think this would help your viewers get more information about Herr Zundel and exactly what happened to him.)

Vlad May 3, 2010 10:08 pm (Pacific time)

Natalie: Perhaps you are unaware, but Herr Zundel is simply following the laws set forth by the country he now resides in, which is Germany. It is lawfully ILLEGAL (read again: ILLEGAL) to have any thoughts/opinions/questions/different opinions that differ from the Official Holocaust Story. For instance, you will be sent to prison for up to five years for simply asking a mere question that does not support the Official Holocaust Story. This is why Herr Zundel is not answering questions and this is why you are implicating him in such a manner. Yes, you read that correctly. Germany is one of eleven countries that has this law. Should you ask a question that doesn't agree with the Official Holocaust Story - you go to jail for up to five years. To both Natalie and GP: Herr Zundel's crime was simply this: asking questions about the Official Holocaust Story. That's it. That's all. That's the end of it. Seems ridiculous, right? Well, that's all he did. He didn't bomb anything, shoot anybody, rape anybody, harm anybody, beat anybody, kill any animals or destroy any property. He simply ASKED QUESTIONS. That's all. It would behoove you to read about this man before typing a response to article about him and what he has or hasn't done. Like he said, the information is out there. It's up to you to find it and make up your own mind... "Ding-Ding! Anybody?"

gp May 2, 2010 9:18 pm (Pacific time)

this article troubles me. I, like Natalie, want to know more about his alleged crimes and his defens.

Natalie May 1, 2010 7:04 pm (Pacific time)

Why can't he answer the questions about Hitler and Holocaust? "An honest and complete answer would land me in jail as a re-offender very quickly." -What exactly does it mean? What ARE his "controversial viewpoints?" I don't see any details. Not many spend 7 years behind bars for having controversial opinions. "I cannot answer this question due to legal restraints". Fancy words. It's like "Scott Peterson, did you kill your wife?" - "Aaaa, mmmmm, I will not answer this question" Ding-Ding! Anybody? No? Am I the only one with a twisted mind here? When you have nothing to hide, you don't hide. Period.

Matt May 1, 2010 2:37 pm (Pacific time)

Wonderful and scary story. Thanks!

Sam Bolivar May 1, 2010 12:22 pm (Pacific time)

This was a fine article. Good, intellectually honest people should view the actions taken by Zionists, their apologists, and the Israeli and American governments against Mr. Zundel and so many other good people as despicable. Mr. Zundel, many of us support you and your work. The search for truth which you exemplify will eventually overcome the Zionists control of the Western (especially U.S.) media. Sam Bolivar StrivingForJustice @ yahoo. com

Douglas Benson May 1, 2010 8:48 am (Pacific time)

Great article ! I was sure the invisable enemy garbage would be rolled out after Mcviegh .Regardless here it is a slap in the face to our entire list of the inallenable rights our country was founded on . We were warned for a long time about the dangers to our founding principals by such policies.

HG in New York May 1, 2010 8:33 am (Pacific time)

It is to the credit of FP, as a major publication, to provide the rare opportunity to Ernst Zundel, expresiing his counter views. It is obvious, he and the rest of us, are beset with a vast neferious influence.

[Return to Top]
©2020 All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of

Articles for April 30, 2010 | Articles for May 1, 2010 | Articles for May 2, 2010
Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar

Sean Flynn was a photojournalist in Vietnam, taken captive in 1970 in Cambodia and never seen again.

Donate to and help us keep the news flowing! Thank you.