Wednesday October 22, 2014
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com
Zip Weather


Weather Forecast
Keizer is a thriving community near Salem, Oregon

 

May-02-2012 13:08printcomments

New Study Predicts Frack Fluids Can Migrate to Aquifers Within Years

Much of the debate about the environmental risks of gas drilling has centered on the risk that spills could pollute surface water or that structural failures would cause wells to leak.

Fracking is a serious issue for the U.S. public
Fracking is a serious issue for the U.S. public

(WASHINGTON DC ProPublica) - A new study has raised fresh concerns about the safety of gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale, concluding that fracking chemicals injected into the ground could migrate toward drinking water supplies far more quickly than experts have previously predicted.

More than 5,000 wells were drilled in the Marcellus between mid-2009 and mid-2010, according to the study, which was published in the journal Ground Water [1] two weeks ago. Operators inject up to 4 million gallons of fluid, under more than 10,000 pounds of pressure, to drill and frack each well.

Multimedia

Scientists have theorized that impermeable layers of rock would keep the fluid, which contains benzene and other dangerous chemicals, safely locked nearly a mile below water supplies. This view of the earth's underground geology is a cornerstone of the industry's argument that fracking poses minimal threats to the environment.

But the study, using computer modeling, concluded that natural faults and fractures in the Marcellus, exacerbated by the effects of fracking itself, could allow chemicals to reach the surface in as little as "just a few years."

"Simply put, [the rock layers] are not impermeable," said the study's author, Tom Myers, an independent hydrogeologist whose clients include [2] the federal government and environmental groups.

"The Marcellus shale is being fracked into a very high permeability," he said. "Fluids could move from most any injection process."

The research for the study was paid for by Catskill Mountainkeeper and the Park Foundation, two upstate New York organizations that have opposed gas drilling and fracking in the Marcellus.

Much of the debate about the environmental risks [3] of gas drilling has centered on the risk that spills could pollute surface water or that structural failures would cause wells to leak.

Though some scientists believed it was possible for fracking to contaminate underground water supplies, those risks have been considered secondary. The study in Ground Water is the first peer-reviewed research evaluating this possibility.

The study did not use sampling or case histories to assess contamination risks. Rather, it used software and computer modeling to predict how fracking fluids would move over time. The simulations sought to account for the natural fractures and faults in the underground rock formations and the effects of fracking.

The models predict that fracking will dramatically speed up the movement of chemicals injected into the ground. Fluids traveled distances within 100 years that would take tens of thousands of years under natural conditions. And when the models factored in the Marcellus' natural faults and fractures, fluids could move 10 times as fast as that.

Where man-made fractures intersect with natural faults, or break out of the Marcellus layer into the stone layer above it, the study found, "contaminants could reach the surface areas in tens of years, or less."

The study also concluded that the force that fracking exerts does not immediately let up when the process ends. It can take nearly a year to ease.

As a result, chemicals left underground are still being pushed away from the drill site long after drilling is finished. It can take five or six years before the natural balance of pressure in the underground system is fully restored, the study found.

Myers' research focused exclusively on the Marcellus, but he said his findings may have broader relevance. Many regions where oil and gas is being drilled have more permeable underground environments than the one he analyzed, he said.

"One would have to say that the possible travel times for a similar thing in Arkansas or Northeast Texas is probably faster than what I've come up with," Myers said.

Ground Water is the journal of the National Ground Water Association [4], a non-profit group that represents scientists, engineers and businesses in the groundwater industry.

Several scientists called Myers' approach unsophisticated and said that the assumptions he used for his models didn't reflect what they knew about the geology of the Marcellus Shale. If fluids could flow as quickly as Myers asserts, said Terry Engelder, a professor of geosciences at Penn State University who has been a proponent of shale development, fracking wouldn't be necessary to open up the gas deposits.

"This would be a huge fracture porosity," Engelder said. "So I read this and I say, 'Golly, does this guy really understand anything about what these shales look like?' The concern then arises from using a model rather than observations."

Myers likened the shale to a cracked window, saying that samples showing it didn't contain fractures were small in size and were akin to only examining an intact section of glass, while a broader, scaled out view would capture the faults and fractures that could leak.

Both scientists agreed that direct evidence of fluid migration is needed, but little sampling has been done to analyze where fracking fluids go after being injected underground.

Myers says monitoring systems could be installed around gas well sites to measure for changes in water quality, a measure required for some gold mines, for example. Until that happens, Myers said, theoretical modeling has to substitute for hard data.

"We were trying to use the basic concepts of groundwater and hydrology and geology and say can this happen?" he said. "And that had basically never been done."

Salem-News.com's Roger Butow wrote about this subject before most people had even heard the term, read these articles for more background:

Feb-10-2012: Environmental Protection Agencies: Federal and State Versions Under Siege - Roger E. Bütow ODD MAN OUT for Salem-News.com

Jan-06-2012: Fracking/Public Health Controversy - National Conference on Shale Gas Production Impacts to be Held in DC Salem-News.com

Jul-03-2010: Clean Water Underground? Halliburton says: 'Fugetaboutit!' America's Water Supplies Get Freaking Fracked - Roger Butow Salem-News.com's 'Odd Man Out'

Special thanks to Pro Publica

https://www.propublica.org/article/new-study-predicts-frack-fluids-can-migrate-to-aquifers-within-years




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



Roger E. Bütow May 3, 2012 12:03 pm (Pacific time)

For those who still cling to the antiquated notion that the 70s creation and subsequent aggressive enforcement of enviro-laws and regs have had no effect on the reduction of carcinogenic pollutants, go to this LA Times article today by Tony Barboza: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-0503-clean-beaches-20120503,0,1659006.story


Roger E. Bütow May 3, 2012 11:48 am (Pacific time)

Computer modeling is at times the ONLY way to project impacts through time and space. Almost every agency analyst uses them. Engineers, physicists, you name it they use them as a tool in their pouch.
Yes, they can be wrong but get amended as they're peer reviewed or refuted by, guess what? SUBSEQUENT events and hence revised models!
In a sense they are jumping off points, they establish or propose baseline scientific propositions, are usually created from historical occurrences.
I wince every time I read GLOBAL WARMING because it includes a n unprovable human, sometimes random variable.
CLIMATE CHANGE only admits/addresses what's occurring, NOT why.
And if either concept is even partly true, waiting for that FULLNESS isn't exactly proactive...or smart unless you're a Luddite..


Anonymous May 2, 2012 3:10 pm (Pacific time)

Well in the fullness of time we can see how accurate the computer models are. Ditto for climate warming, now climate change.

[Return to Top]
©2014 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.
comments powered by Disqus


Articles for May 1, 2012 | Articles for May 2, 2012 | Articles for May 3, 2012

Since 1985, Salem Tattoo is one of the oldest and most established shops in Salem, in Oregon's Willamette Valley.


Steele`s Karate
In Salem
Sign Up Now!

Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar