Wednesday July 8, 2020
SNc Channels:



Oct-24-2012 11:28printcomments

Tasers May Not Be As Safe As Advertised

Someone struck by a Taser experiences stimulation of his or her sensory nerves and motor nerves, resulting in strong involuntary muscle contractions.

Tasers are made in the USA and exported to many countries.
Tasers are made in the USA and exported to many countries.

(SAN FRANCISCO) - According to Wikipedia (, a taser is an electroshock weapon sold by Taser International, Inc. It uses electric current to disrupt voluntary control of muscles causing neuromuscular incapacitation.  Someone struck by a Taser experiences stimulation of his or her sensory nerves and motor nerves, resulting in strong involuntary muscle contractions. Tasers do not rely only on pain compliance, except when used in Drive Stun mode, and are thus preferred by some law enforcement over non-Taser stun guns and other electronic control weapons.

Tasers are used by more than 12,000 law enforcement, military and correctional agencies in the U.S. and abroad,

According to Taser International, Inc. (, located in Scottsdale Arizona, Tasers or Electronic Control Devices (ECDs) are "used worldwide by law enforcement, military, correctional, professional security, and personal protection markets. TASER ECDs use proprietary technology to incapacitate dangerous, combative, or high-risk subjects who pose a risk to law enforcement/correctional officers, innocent citizens, or themselves in a manner that is generally recognized as a safer alternative to other uses of force. TASER technology protects life, and the use of TASER devices dramatically reduces injury rates for law enforcement officers and suspects."

But Tasers may not be as safe as the company says.  Tasers "can cause cardiac electrical capture and provoke cardiac arrest due to ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. After prolonged ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation without resuscitation, asystole develops." (

Amnesty International reported ( that at least 500 people have died since 2001 after being shocked by Tasers either during arrest or while in jail.

On May 6, 2011, a team of cardiologists at the University of California, San Francisco announced findings suggesting that much of the current Tasers-related safety research may be biased because of ties to the devices’ manufacturer.  Some 96 percent of studies supported by Taser concluded that the devices were “not harmful” or “unlikely harmful.” By comparison, only 55 percent of the independent studies found the devices to be “not harmful” or “unlikely harmful.”

In addition, researchers ( analyzed sudden death data from 50 law enforcement agencies in California that use Tasers. They compared the death rate pre- and post-Taser deployment - analyzing data for five years before each agency began using Tasers and five years afterward and found a sixfold increase in sudden deaths during the first year of Taser use -or nearly 6 deaths per 100,000 arrests.  However, after the first year, the rate of sudden deaths dropped down to nearly pre-Taser levels, suggesting that police and others in law enforcement altered the way they were using the devices to make them less lethal.

At the time of the study, California did not have a state-wide training standard for stun guns, even though they had been used in the state for decades.  Taser International, Inc. does provide introductory training.  After that, the individual law enforcement agency does supplemental training.  The California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training sets minimum training standards. But generally, training is on an agency by agency basis and the content of the supplemental training could vary.

In December 2008, Amnesty International issued USA - Stun Guns In Law Enforcement ( urging "law enforcement officials to suspend the use of stun guns pending further research or to limit their use to situations where law enforcement officers would otherwise be justified in resorting to deadly force and where no lesser alternatives were available."  In addition, Amnesty International called on "police authorities to put in place specific guidelines, training and accountability systems for CED use and to tighten the guidelines in order to limit the number and duration of shocks allowed."

Amnesty International's recommendations seem sensible and should be adopted before Tasers are even considered for use.

Also see these reports:

Jul-08-2010: Police Tasers and Excessive Force in America - Tim King

Aug-03-2009: Police in U.S. Will Soon Have Multi Shot Taser Guns - Political Perspective by Tim King

Aug-04-2009: Taser Use in the U.S. is a Serious Problem - Political Perspective by Tim King

Jun-08-2009: Texas Cops Support Taser Strikes on 72-Year Old Great Grandmother (VIDEO) - Political Perspective by Tim King -

Apr-27-2009: More Police Abuse in the Southwest? - Tim King

___________________________________ writer Ralph E. Stone was born in Massachusetts. He is a graduate of both Middlebury College and Suffolk Law School. We are very fortunate to have this writer's talents in this troubling world; Ralph has an eye for detail that others miss. As is the case with many writers, Ralph is an American Veteran who served in war. Ralph served his nation after college as a U.S. Army officer during the Vietnam war. After Vietnam, he went on to have a career with the Federal Trade Commission as an Attorney specializing in Consumer and Antitrust Law. Over the years, Ralph has traveled extensively with his wife Judi, taking in data from all over the world, which today adds to his collective knowledge about extremely important subjects like the economy and taxation. You can send Ralph an email at this address



Comments Leave a comment on this story.

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

Albert Marnell June 11, 2016 8:27 am (Pacific time) Hello Bonnie & Tim. Remember me? I happen to just want you to remember 10 years ago and my comment about a baby. I was trying to make a point. Tasers should not be allowed to be used. They kill more often than you think. Thank You...I'm fighting the unconstitutional and very dangerous red light cameras here. It is a contract with Xerox. See Stephen Ruth, the Red light Robinhood. He is also on Facebook under redlightrobinhood. Our government is out of control which of course allows law enforcement to be out of control.

[Return to Top]
©2020 All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of

Articles for October 23, 2012 | Articles for October 24, 2012 | Articles for October 25, 2012

Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.

Sean Flynn was a photojournalist in Vietnam, taken captive in 1970 in Cambodia and never seen again.

Your customers are looking: Advertise on!

Donate to and help us keep the news flowing! Thank you.