Tuesday September 17, 2019
SNc Channels:

About Salem-News.com


Jan-05-2012 16:32printcomments

9/11 and Israel: Alan Sabrosky's Candid Interview

If you're American, this would arouse fierce anger, shock, and indignation and make your blood boil.

(MELBOURNE) - In this edition of the Autograph, Susan Modaress interviews Dr. Alan Sabrosky, a ten-year US Marine Corps Veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College.

A writer and consultant, specializing in national and international security affairs, who with astonishing candour discloses intriguing facts on the implication of Israel in 9/11 events that are by and large unheard of in mainstream media:

I believe once we have cracked the wall built around 9-11, the entire edifice of lies will crumble. As soon as the question becomes legitimate to Americans they will not wait for the answers, they will move.

They will probably do a lot of damage, much of it in the wrong places, but they will move, and they will take the wind out of Zionism or send it running for cover.

Anyone watching the following interviews and the BBC documentary couldn't fail to put 2 and 2 together. It got me pretty furious, but I imagine that if you're American, this would arouse fierce anger, shock, and indignation and make your blood boil.

Candid Interview about 9/11 by Dr. Alan Sabrosky

The Autograph-07-13-2011

WTC7: The "Smoking Gun" of 9/11

Dr. Sabrosky has repeatedly cited the well known demolition expert Danny Jowenko's views and interview in his recent articles and interviews.

A few days after Dr. Sabrosky’s Press TV interview, Danny Jowenko was killed in a one-car crash. Yet the dog in the car with him survived….

Dutch Demolition Expert Danny Jowenko Dies In Car Crash


As a follow up Dr. Sabrosky writes about putting ideas into Action

I wanted to update everyone on a talk I gave the day after the PressTV interview, and how that impacted my ideas on how to outline a strategy to proceed to move ahead and do something about this in the future other than let this disappear into the cybernetic dustbin.

1. A talk to a church. Basically, I was invited by the senior pastor of a large evangelical church in PA (an Assemblies of God congregation, same one as Sarah Palin's) to address the pastors and lay leaders of the church on 9/11 (he also invited a couple of other local pastors, also evangelicals but different denomination). This matters, because as I learned (some of you might already know this), aside from a belief in "rapture," they are also committed to both American exceptionalism and Israeli exceptionalism, and the latter sets them apart from most other US Christians (e.g., Catholics). The invitation came out of the blue, the senior pastor had himself had doubts of the government story about 9/11, had read some of my work, and made the invitation.

So I went to the church and gave them (in this sequence) part of my slideshow (parts dealing with the USS Liberty incident and the 9-11 material, then the Jowenko video on WTC7, then about 4 minutes of the "Sounds on the Ground" video (parts on secondary explosions at the base of the twin towers, media reports of same, etc.), then wrapped it up discussing role of people in place, the motivation-expertise-access combo, and the implications thereof. Oh, yes: I began with a brief indirect overview of me, pointing out that when the USS Liberty incident occurred, I was in Vietnam with the Marines, which also got their attention.

By the end of the presentation (about 50 minutes, including the slideshow & the two videos) and nearly two hours of Q&A, certain themes became apparent (and my wife, who was present, picked up on them faster than me). One was that "things military" mattered more for me than "things academic" insofar as my credibility was concerned – i.e., service in the Marines in Vietnam and later the Army War College meant more than a Michigan PhD and teaching at Georgetown – yet another reason to have our outreach made by, or include, a veteran, no matter what the audience.

Another is that I have been wrong when I have dismissed the USS Liberty incident as too many years in the past to matter. The audience was literally riveted by the incident itself (none had ever heard or read of it before, and all were educated people), by the visible contrast between the US & Egyptian ships, by the photographic evidence of the ship's identity before and after the attack, and the recall of US fighters twice. So when I rework the presentation, I am going to include more material on the USS Liberty incident, and if possible a few minutes of a video on it (maybe the BBC documentary below).

A third is that at the end, everyone present was outraged by the USS Liberty incident (more because of what the US Government had done than because of what Israel had done), all but one present believed that the official US Government version of 9/11 is either incomplete or an outright lie, BUT barely half accepted Israel's role in it (and this is because of their commitment to Israeli exceptionalism – one woman asked how they could continue end their services with a prayer for Israel if it had done that, so she would not accept Israel's complicity or guilt for 9/11 rather than reject the doctrine of her church).

2. Hitting Congress at Town Meetings. A classic set of questions is why no one talks about WTC7 or the secondary explosions at the base of the Twin Towers (which the impacting airliners could not have caused), or the van with explosives, or the van with the "dancing Israelis" — these are enough to cause almost all of them to twist in the wind. And if they waffle on Israel, then refer back to the USS Liberty incident as a precedent (they attacked Americans once for their own interests, why wouldn't they do it again?), which of course opens up that incident.

We are making progress when a major media outlet such as the BBC airs in such detail the USS Liberty incident, especially after the 9/11 incident.

BBC Documentary: Dead In The Water

During the Six-Day War, Israel attacked and nearly sank the American Spy ship USS Liberty belonging to its closest ally, the USA.

Thirty-four American servicemen were killed in the two-hour assault by Israeli warplanes and torpedo boats. Israel claimed that the whole affair had been a tragic accident based on mistaken identification of the US Spy ship.

The American government accepted the explanation. For more than 30 years many people have disbelieved the official explanation but have been unable to rebut it convincingly.

Now, Dead in the Water uses startling new evidence to reveal the truth behind the seemingly inexplicable attack.

The film combines dramatic reconstruction of the events, with new access to former officers in the US and Israeli armed forces and intelligence services who have decided to give their own version of events.

Interviews include President Lyndon Johnson's Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara, former head of the Israeli navy Admiral Shlomo Errell and members of the USS Liberty crew.

See the original BBC documentary video here.

The BBC documentary seems to have been broadcast in August 2008, our Anthony Lawson, has covered this attack recently in his video below beginning at: Counter 2:00

The Liberty was monitoring Israel's every communication, and I'm sure that the full story is yet to be told. This video refers to Admiral Thomas Moorer, former commander of the U.S. 7th Fleet, who wrote his damning commentary on the event in the January 16, 2004 edition of the Stars and Stripes.

AIPAC: The Voice of America — Part 2 The Treasonous Dollar Drain

Related Posts:

Debbie Menon is an independent writer based in Dubai. An advocate for Justice and Peace for Palestinians in the Occupied Territories. Her main focus is US-Middle East Policy issues while writing cutting edge commentary for today's growing number of Internet news viewers seeking unfiltered information about real events. She is committed to exposing Israel Lobbies control of U.S. Middle East Policy. Her Website, mycatbirdseat.com, is a source for many other Salem-News.com reports.

Debbie has a fresh perspective in her interpretation of historical events and their relationship to today's current news developments between Palestine and Israel. She can be reached at: debbiemenon@gmail.com

End Israeli apartheid

Comments Leave a comment on this story.

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

Anonymous January 8, 2012 2:16 pm (Pacific time)

I dont kneejerk Ralph..I have done thousands of hours of research. I dont watch television, do you? Do youknow who owns the stations and provides ALL the programming? Have you ever researched "social engineering"? And you trust the wikileaks things? wikileaks went OUT OF ITS WAY to not talk about israel, or to make israel look good...wikileaks...lmao, go back to your tv and the AP...ah never mind..you are lost...Good luck editor, glad I am not you. I dont mean to be mean here, but read what Ralph wrote himself..Let Tim read it, its a complete joke. AP and wikileaks...dear Jesus...

Ralph E. Stone January 7, 2012 6:18 am (Pacific time)

Anonymous, instead of your usual knee-jerk response, why don't you do a little research. The following gave the U.S. advance warning of a likely attack: French Secret Service, Italian Deputy Prime Minister Gianfranco Fini, Israel Director of Mossad, Jordan Intelligence, Morroco Intelligence, the Russian Foreign Minister, United Kingdom MI5, Egyptian Intelligence, etc. See the list compiled at http://911review.org/Sept11Wiki/EarlyWarnings.shtml. And it has been well established that the FBI failed to act on its own intelligence that something was going to happen. But then again, why spoil a conspiracy theory with facts.

Anonymous January 6, 2012 2:39 pm (Pacific time)

The Associated Press Ralph? You are kidding I hope. You should do some homework and find out who owns mainstream media outlets such as the AP. You should also learn how the mainstream media such as AP and faux news has think tanks 24/7 to control thinking of its readers. They also spread so many lies its beyond my belief. I am surprised you are one of the contributors here and do not even know the basics.

Editor: Many of us are so overloaded and burned out by the MSM shuffle that we underestimate the power and reach they indeed have, and use to keep Americans in step.  However I believe our goal is always to see them move toward the light.  Ralph critically challenges our beliefs and keeps us on our toes, it is good that everyone here doesn't simply agree, thanks.   

Ralph E. Stone January 6, 2012 7:02 am (Pacific time)

It is my understanding that the Associated Press reported that "Israeli intelligence services were aware several months before Sept. 11 that bin Laden was planning a large-scale terror attack" and that this information was passed on to Washington. According to Fox News, In August 2001, Israel warned the US that an al-Qaeda attack is imminent. Reportedly, two high-ranking agents from the Mossad came to Washington and warned the FBI and CIA that up to 200 terrorists have slipped into the US and are planning "a major assault on the United States... [on a] large scale target." So if Israel was complicit in the 9/11 attacks, why would they warn the U.S. in advance?

[Return to Top]
©2019 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.

Articles for January 4, 2012 | Articles for January 5, 2012 | Articles for January 6, 2012


Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin

Your customers are looking: Advertise on Salem-News.com!

Donate to Salem-News.com and help us keep the news flowing! Thank you.