Tuesday June 25, 2019
SNc Channels:

About Salem-News.com


Jan-31-2013 21:43printcommentsVideo

Leaked Video Shows Cruise Missile Hitting Pentagon on 911 [VIDEO]

Released in December, the video shows something hitting the building that is clearly not a 757 airplane...

Pentagon after 911
Millions of Americans stopped believing this damage came from a 757 on the first day of the event, it is amazing what people will believe in the name of patriotism, or blind faith.

(WASHINGTON DC) - Suppressed video released 10 years after 9/11 attacks in the United States clearly shows the Pentagon attack was a Cruise type missile, either a Tomahawk or Russian/Soviet Granit as described by a former Soviet nuclear intelligence officer Dimitri Khalezov.

For those who do not know, video cameras from a Chevron gas station, a Hilton hotel and a Virginia state highway division were all seized by FBI agents immediately after the Pentagon was attacked on 911.

The little explosions which have been circled in the video clearly point out that “there is no huge jet” hammering into the Pentagon, Khalezov explains.

According to the official U.S. government narration, an American Airline Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

The Boeing 757 is a mid-size, narrow-body twin-engine jet airliner manufactured by Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Its dimension specification include: Wing span 38.05m (124ft 10in), length 47.32m (155ft 3in), height 13.56m (44ft 6in). Wing area 185.3m2 (1994sq ft).

This is what the govt. wants you to believe

The author of “The third truth about September 11″ says every time he uploads such videos on the internet “my YouTube gets deleted or the hits go down.”

He describes a hole that appeared in a Pentagon wall right after the attack. “Look at that little hole. No way a jet [can] fit in there. Where’s the wings? Where’s the engines?” The researcher says when the footage is observed frame by frame it shows that “the explosion happens before the ‘jet’ even appears.”

After 11 September 2001, Khalezov undertook extensive research on the collapse of the three World Trade Center Towers. The research is claimed to demonstrate that the three towers were demolished by three underground thermo-nuclear explosions.

Moreover, Khalezov claims that he knew about the in-built so-called “emergency nuclear demolitions scheme” for the Twin Towers as long ago as the 1980′s, while a serviceman in the Soviet Special Control Service.




Comments Leave a comment on this story.

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

Tim White February 1, 2013 11:10 pm (Pacific time)

From: Tim White
Received: Wednesday, January 2, 2013, 11:53 AM

From: Tim White phantom.421366@yahoo.com
Received: Sunday, June 24, 2012, 2:14 PM

EXCERPTED and taken out of order from a very extensive 2.5+ MEG report I started more than a year ago
that involves a lot of my personal knowledge and experience with the tentative title of "9/11 = UNRESTRICTED WARFARE...The BUSH CRIME FAMILY-SECRET TREATY of Ft HUNT/PROJECT PAPERCLIP-ODESSA-The CIA-The SECRET TEAM-The DIXIE MAFIA-The OCTOPUS = 4th REICH FASCIST NAZIS in AMERICA"...I spoke about much of this in 3 radio interviews I did in June 2006....and VERY nearly VERY DEAD from several attempts on my life in Denver back in 2005/2006 and Bayview Idaho back in July 2006 for having done so...

it's why I am no longer in the States...I'm now in Vancouver BC



911 Pentagon Conspiracy

BBC Photo shows A3 Skywarrior 9/11 Pentagon Hit. From: Tim White ..... was the FACT that 2 A-3 Skywarriors(owned by RAYTHEON) were modified at the Ft ...911-penta-gon.blogspot.com/ - Cached

911 Pentagon Conspiracy: CIA front Evergreen Airlines, 911 and ...

10 Sep 2007... was the FACT that 2 A-3 Skywarriors(owned by RAYTHEON) were modified at the Ft ... Tim White,Viet Nam Vet(USAF),Concerned Citizen ...911-penta-gon.blogspot.com/.../date-mon-10-sep-2007-134851-0700-pdt. html - Cached

[cia-drugs] 9/11 WTC/PENTAGON ATTACKS: High Military Brass Verify ...

24 Jan 2010 ... From: Tim White Subject: Re: PHOTO OF DARRELL SKURICH---CIA BLACK OPS GOON ... was the FACT that 2 A-3 Skywarriors(owned by RAYTHEON) were ...www.mail-archive.com/cia-drugs@yahoogroups.../msg13861.html - Cached

911, The Pentagon And The A3 Skywarrior Theory

To this very day, Raytheon Hughes uses a fleet of A3 Skywarriors to test fire rockets and ... Jack White backs the JT8D research and the A3 connection: ...www.rense.com/general70/safe.htm - Cached

Who is Darrell Skurich - (970) 493-3347 - Fort Collins - CO ...

From: Tim White Subject: Re: PHOTO OF DARRELL SKURICH---CIA BLACK OPS GOON ... was the FACT that 2 A-3 Skywarriors(owned by RAYTHEON) were modified at the . ...waatp.com/people/darrell-skurich/19470557/

What hit the Pentagon on on 9/11/01?

Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. ... It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need ... Also note the bright white secondary explosion. ...www.wikilaw3k.org/.../What-hit-the-Pentagon-on-on-9-11-01-337490.htm - Cached

WTC2 The South Tower Anomalies Thread., page 1

17 posts - 6 authors - Last post: 31 Aug 2009
3). The blue lines indicate roughly the size of the chunk (34 storeys) ... white phosphorus although controversial has been used in the modern day .... The attack jet was an A-3 Skywarrior from Raytheon's fleet, flown by ...www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread496897/pg1 - Cached
9/11 and Raytheon Connection

27 Dec 2008 ... Hughes was purchased by Raytheon before 9-11 and that company has a fleet of A-3 Skywarriors that they use for testing air-to-air missiles ...issuu.com/forgenerations/docs/911raytheonconnection - Cached
Witnesses link missile to small military jet parts found at ... PENTAGON To:
Received: Tuesday, January 25, 2011, 3:32 PM
Mistel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The definitive Mistel warhead was a very large shaped charge, of nearly two short tons in weight, and fitted with a copper or aluminium liner, ...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistel - Cached
www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org - Luftwaffe Resource Center - Mistel ...

The definitive Mistel warhead was a shaped charge around a core of copper or aluminium. When detonated, the explosion would create a penetrator made of the ...www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/mistral.html - Cached
911 Pentagon Conspiracy

The definitive Mistel warhead was a shaped charge around a core of copper or aluminium. When detonated, the explosion would create a penetrator made of the ...911-penta-gon.blogspot.com/ - Cached
Presentation by Gordon Thompson IRSS and Clark University - Public ...

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML 23 Sep 2010 ... Shaped Charge Warhead, 1943 ... The Mistel Shaped Charge. Delivery System, 1944. Page 9. Bunker Busting with Clustered. Shaped Charges, 2008 ...brc.gov/Transportation_Storage_SC/.../B%20Thompson%20BRC.pdf

Shaped Charge Concept, An Overview - Walters.pdf - An Overview of ...

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick Viewby W Walters - Related articlesThe largest known shaped charge was the German MISTEL. The MISTEL (mistletoe) concept used a fighter aircraft mounted piggyback on the top of a large bomber ...knygos.sprogmenys.net/.../Shaped%20Charges.../Shaped%20Charge%20Concept,%20An%20Overview%20-%20Walters.pdf


DID GORDON THOMPSON of IRSS/Clark University know about
what I've been posting for the past few years to the Internet about MISTEL
to include the MISTEL into his report of September 23,2010 ?.....well I
SURE THINK so...otherwise,WHY cite a NAZI weapon from 1944 on a report in 2010 ?
because I'm quite sure it EXISTS in an "updated version"....certainly the MISTEL
warhead was a PROVEN SUCCESS but the weak link in the deployed system in
1944 was the DELIVERY SYSTEM....that 1944 problem was corrected on September
11,2001 by the use of a RAYTHEON owned and CIA/EVERGREEN modified
MOST 9-11 researchers/"researchers" are completely confused about GLOBAL HAWK
since most people think it's just ONE aircraft type when in fact it's a SYSTEM that can
be installed in virtually ANY aircraft.....

From: Tim White Subject: re: PENTAGON ATTACK To:
Received: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 1:32 PM


On the ABEL DANGER blog there is COMPLETELY ERRONEOUS INFO regarding the TYPE of missile fired off the A-3 SKYWARRIOR pylon as an OUTER WALL BREACHING WEAPON ...the list of possible missile types used is a VERY short list indeed...the missile used was MOST assuredly a MACH 1.8 AGM-12C BULLPUP with a SEMI-ARMOR PIERCING/HIGH EXPLOSIVE 970 LB WARHEAD and NOT an AGM-65 MAVERICK with a 125-300 LB WARHEAD (depending on variant) - the AGM-65 is simply NOT powerful enough for desired results...in addition to this - the EXTENSIVE damage through 3 "rings" that was evident at the PENTAGON was NOT caused by the AGM-12C and the A-3 SKYWARRIOR airframe themselves but with the ADDITION of a GIANT SHAPED CHARGE in the NOSE of the A-3 in the SAME manner as the NAZIS did in WW II with the MISTEL system first deployed in Summer 1944...there is a VERY interesting PENTAGON ATTACK thread on ABOVE TOP SECRET (www.abovetopsecret.com) where someone posted a series of photos and also made this exact statement on the photo showing this view ==> " THE DAMAGE CAUSED APPEARS TO BE LIKE A ROUND TUNNEL WAS BLASTED RIGHT THROUGH ALL 3 RINGS "...this is the EXACT "signature" of what the largest MISTEL SHAPED CHARGE of 7,700 POUNDS was designed to do - the capability was penetration of 24 FEET of STEEL ARMOR PLATE and up to 60 FEET of RE-INFORCED CONCRETE and keep in mind the A-3 is a MUCH more powerful aircraft with a MUCH greater load carrying capability than ANY of the aircraft used by the NAZIS in WW II for the MISTEL REMOTE CONTROL WEAPONS....now do you THINK for ONE SECOND that LONG TIME CIA/EVERGREEN AIR ASSET DARRELL SKURICH - a guy with a WORLD CLASS reputation for rebuilding WW II fighter aircraft at his VINTAGE AIRCRAFT Ltd in Ft Collins - and he's an EXPERT on NAZI aircraft - and apparently ANOTHER "crew"(CIA) involved than his own crew at Vintage did NOT KNOW OF THIS WEAPON from 57 YEARS AGO at the time of 9/11 ?...NOT A CHANCE...BTW...I was trained on the AGM-12C guidance system as well as the very FIRST of the "smart weapons"...the TV-guided un-powered,lockon-release-and-forget glide bomb - the AGM-62 WALLEYE...a highly accurate weapon - launched from 15 miles away and 20,000ft ...the very first prototype test hitting the very middle of 36" dia crosshairs on a concrete test structure in a classified SECRET film I watched in 1968 while at MacDill AFB in Tampa...so I think I know a little bit about what I'm saying here....

Tim White,Viet Nam Vet(USAF)
Concerned Citizen,Researcher,Investigator,Whistleblower
Weapons Fire Control/RADAR Technician with a SECRET security clearance
F-4E and D Phantoms
366th TAC Fighter Wing - THE GUNFIGHTERS
DaNang Air Base Viet Nam 1969-1970

Martin AGM-12 Bullpup
20 Nov 2007 ... The final production Bullpup version was the USAF's AGM-12E. This variant was a derivative of the AGM-12C, in which the unitary warhead was ...www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-12.html - Cached

Raytheon AGM-65 Maverick
7 Apr 2005 ... The AGM-65 Maverick was the first general purpose fire-and-forget tactical air- to-ground missile in service with the U.S. Air Force. ...www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-65.html - Cached

A Mistel like proposal suggested a Ar 234/ Ar E377. The Arado Ar E377 was a unmanned mid-wing airplane which could have a 2000 kg (4409 lb) hollow-charge ...greyfalcon.us/restored/Junkers%20Ju%2088.htm - Cached

Thus far the Mistel idea had little to commend it, for the expenditure of one Ju 88 bomber to deliver a mere 3 ton warhead to a target was a grossly uneconomical method. But if a special warhead could be fitted to the explosive aircraft, a warhead which could punch through almost any protective layer of armor, the possibilities became very attractive.
THE HOLLOW CHARGE The warhead fitted to the Mistel was of the hollow charge type. Such warheads were used a great deal during the war against tanks. But with the Mistel a hollow charge warhead weighing 7,700 pounds - far larger than any built before or since - was to be used. Below is an early Mistel 1 combination, with the hollow charge war- head fitted in place of the crew compartment of the Ju 88 lower component. This warhead, seen below on a Mistel 1, was capable of "drilling" a hole clean through the hull of even the most heavily armored warship.
The hollow charge, as fitted to the Mistel, was intended to blow a hole through the thick steel armor of a battleship. The shape of the 3,800 pound explosive charge was important. At the front end of the explosive charge was a cone-shaped hollow cavity which was lined with a layer of soft metal-either copper or aluminum. It was important that a soft metal be used for this liner, since a harder metal would prevent the hollow charge action from developing properly. Four electrical crush fuses, for firing the detonator of the main charge, were mounted at the end of the nine foot long stand-off probe which protruded from the front of the warhead; the detonator for the main charge was situated at the rear of the warhead. When the stand-off probe hit the target the crush fuses operated, set off the detonator, and thus fired the main charge. Because of its shape and the fact that it was burning from the rear forwards, the force of the main charge was focused on to the soft metal liner. The liner became fluid, and was pushed forward from the centre of the cone in a fine jet. A split-second later the hollow charge action had developed completely. The metal in the liner was now "squirted" forwards in a stream about one foot in diameter, a stream which reached speeds of between 2.0 and 2.5 times the speed of sound. Thus the hollow-charge acted as a "gun", and the soft metal liner as a "bullet". The colossal speed attained by the thin jet of soft metal gave it the energy necessary to "drill" a hole clean through steel armor with a thickness of up to four times the maximum diameter of the warhead itself; in the case of the six foot diameter warhead fitted to the Mistel lower component, this gave a theoretical maximum penetration of the order of 24 feet. Such a warhead would I penetrate the heaviest armor carried by a ship with ease. Once through the outer protective shell of the target, and now confined inside it, the jet of high energy metal would vaporize anything in its path.
The stand-off probe was necessary to set off the main explosive charge at the optimum distance from the target, so that the soft metal liner had time to form itself into a thin jet before it struck. Within limits, the further the charge from the target when it was detonated, the thinner and deeper the hole "drilled"; the closer the charge to the target, the wider and shallower the penetration. Both long and short stand- off probes were used with the Mistel. The entire hollow-charge action took place within one ten-thousandth part of a second, during which time a relatively slow-moving Ju 88 explosive aircraft, impacting at 400 m.p.h., moved forwards about a half an inch. This, then, was the potential of the Mistel device

Tim White says:
June 26, 2007 at 7:01 pm

I have IMPORTANT info about EVERGREEN AIR...those guys are the ones to mod the aircraft used on 9/11 against the WTC and the A-3 Skywarrior at the Pentagon.This has been CONFIRMED PERSONALLY to me by Col Donn de Grand Pre and I’m in touch with Brig Gen Ben Partin too.I’m a friend of Ted Gunderson(FBI SAC-ret LA office) and former top aide to Bill Colby,John DeCamp,knows me too.Check out the name,DARRELL SKURICH..he’s the guy that headed up the mod crew in Ft Collins CO that did the REMOTE CONTROL mods on the 2 A-3s…I have EXTENSIVE info on this and Col Donn has said I’m droppin’ em in the pickle barrel so that’s why the flak is REAL HEAVY against me - being DIRECTLY over the target…I’ll tell you why the Pentagon was hit too…it was NOT in the original scenario …ONI knew what was going on and they had to be neutralized by a DIRECT HIT on the Pentagon offices of ONI….


Tim White,Viet Nam Vet(USAF)
Concerned Citizen,Researcher,Investigator,Whistleblower
Weapons Fire Control/RADAR on
F-4C,D and E models
AFSC32251P(F-4C’s,APQ-100 and D’s,APQ-109)

366th TAC Fighter Wing - The GUNFIGHTERS
421st TAC Fighter Squadron - The BLACK WIDOWS (F-4E's)
DaNang Air Base,Viet Nam 1969-1970

Only fools believe what they are told, when it is clear that much else is being hidden.

Tim White February 1, 2013 10:35 pm (Pacific time)

HOAX ALERT - THIS IS REAL PATHETIC AND LONG AGO PROVEN AS A HOAX/DISINFO and pushed by a KNOWN DISINFO AGENT DIMITRI KHALEZOV..but since Tim King knows just about SQUAT about aircraft and aircraft weapons I'm not surprised to see this and it's OBVIOUS as hell that he NEVER paid one bit of attention to what I sent him NUMEROUS times...a REMOTE CONTROLLED A-3 SKYWARRIOR is what was used against the Pentagon... Tim White,Viet Nam Vet(USAF) Concerned Citizen,Researcher,Investigator,Whistleblower Weapons Fire Control/RADAR Technician w/ a SECRET security clearance 421st TAC Fighter Squadron - the BLACK WIDOWS 366th TAC Fighter Wing - The GUNFIGHTERS DaNang Air Base Viet Nam 1969-1970 From: J Rense Subject: Re: MARTIN TIMOTHY //Re: Jeff ..YOU JUST POSTED A PATHETIC PROVEN LONG AGO HOAX "Leaked Video Of Cruise Missile Hitting Pentagon" To: "Tim White" Received: Tuesday, January 15, 2013, 5:12 PM PS - I've run the A-3 story many times...always felt it was 'correct' On Jan 15, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Tim White wrote: the AA logo was PHOTOSHOPPED on that Cruise AGM by a KNOWN DISINFO ASSHOLE down in Sydney Australia by the name of MARTIN TIMOTHY...just Google his name and you'll soon see that he's been tossed from maybe over a 100 message boards by now for doing this and other OUTRAGEOUS total bullshit...what WAS painted up in AA logo/colors was an remote controlled A-3 SKYWARRIOR...I sent you ALL of this before Jeff... --- On Tue, 1/15/13, J Rense wrote: From: J Rense Subject: Re: Jeff ..YOU JUST POSTED A PATHETIC PROVEN LONG AGO HOAX "Leaked Video Of Cruise Missile Hitting Pentagon" To: "Tim White" Received: Tuesday, January 15, 2013, 4:58 PM No and Yes My question remains... AA livery on a cruise missile? And many witnesses looking confused describing a 'small commuter' plane, NOT a Boeing' because they likely didn't know to think cruise missile. ??? On Jan 15, 2013, at 1:51 PM, Tim White wrote: Jeff...let me ask you a question.. do you personally have ANY expertise/personal knowledge of aircraft carried WEAPONS and their capabilities ?..are you aware of what I did in the USAF ? Tim --- On Tue, 1/15/13, J Rense wrote: From: J Rense Subject: Re: Jeff ..YOU JUST POSTED A PATHETIC PROVEN LONG AGO HOAX "Leaked Video Of Cruise Missile Hitting Pentagon" To: "Tim White" Received: Tuesday, January 15, 2013, 4:20 PM I haven't posted anything in over 13 hours. Please send the proof showing this is a hoax...glad to post it. Why would they paint a drone in AA livery? That part, in an of itself, is weird. On Jan 15, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Tim White wrote: this REALLY just DESTROYS your credibility Jeff..... On 9/11Leaked Video Of Cruise Missile Hitting Pentagon - Vid

[Return to Top]
©2019 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.

Articles for January 30, 2013 | Articles for January 31, 2013 | Articles for February 1, 2013
Sean Flynn was a photojournalist in Vietnam, taken captive in 1970 in Cambodia and never seen again.

Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar

Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.

Your customers are looking: Advertise on Salem-News.com!

Donate to Salem-News.com and help us keep the news flowing! Thank you.