Wednesday July 6, 2022
SNc Channels:



Nov-07-2011 04:25printcomments

'Have Rabbis Forgotten The Experiments on Jewish Women at Auschwitz?'

Auschwitz was the largest and one of the most infamous of the camps and the site of numerous ‘medical’ experiments.

Women at Auschwitz-rg
Thousands of Jewish and Gypsy women were victims of torture, experimentation and mass murder at Women at Auschwitz.
Photos courtesy: and

(LOS ANGELES) - Today, rabbis across the US are silent as the Nuremberg Code is being dismantled. From Nurses and the sterilization experiments of Auschwitz: a postmodernist perspective:

"The Nuremberg code originated because of some of humanity’s darkest deeds. .... these principles — though now expanded several times in the Declarations of Helsinki (1964 and 1975, with further revisions in 1983 and 1989) and the Belmont Report (1979) — were created to protect people from inhumane treatment carried out in the name of scientific research. If these principles are fully adhered to, people should be protected from experiments without scientific merit and without full understanding and consent."

Rabbis are aware of Mengele's experiments on twins, perhaps of other hideous experiments done to Auschwitz prisoners, but seem unaware of or to have forgotten one specific type of medical experiment - the sterilization experiments done with untested, unknown vaccines, on Jewish women who could not say no.

"Auschwitz was the largest and one of the most infamous of the camps and the site of numerous ‘medical’ experiments. This historical study uses primary source documents obtained from archives in England and Germany to describe one type of experiment carried out at Auschwitz — the sterilization experiments...

"The purpose of these experiments was to perfect a technique in which non-Aryans could be prevented from reproducing while still being able to work as slave laborers."

Oct. 2011 photo by's Ralph Stone, see: Visiting Auschwitz

"The elder [Blockälteste] told us in general that Dr Clauberg intended to perform scientific experiments on us and if we did not obey, we would be sent to Birkenau [location of the gas chambers]. We said that we would then prefer to go to Birkenau and that we already knew that we would be killed. I cannot recall one woman who had agreed to any such experiments — to the contrary. Dr Clauberg performed sterilization experiments on my person without my consent. I did not protest because it would have been senseless. It happened anyway. Two nurses assisted him — the latter one was a prisoner herself ... The sterilization was done by injection ... As far as I can recall, the pain was the same after each injection and the injections were so painful that the nurses would sit on the victim’s arms (de Leon 1956)."

The focus of the Nazis was on a means to sterilize surreptitiously, and vaccines, under the guise of prevention or treatment of disease, offer that opportunity.

Dr Adolf Pokorny, a Nazi physician wrote to Himmler in October 1941: "Should we succeed in obtaining a method, permitting as quickly as possible to sterilize people without their knowledge, then we would get hold of a new, most effective weapon."

Nazi doctor Carl Clauberg

In 1933 Dr Clauberg had joined the Nazi party and was rapidly promoted to the rank of SS Gruppenführer (Lieutenant General

Clauberg and his 'team' at Auschwitz.

in the Armed Forces (Michael and Doerr 2002)) by 1940. With this loyalty to the party, he decided to combine his specialization in gynecology with two of the goals of National Socialism: the cure of infertility in Aryan women and the sterilization of non- Aryans. These efforts would solidify his political position while also affording him lucrative pharmaceutical contracts (Aziz 1976).

In July 1942 Lieutenant General Rudolf Brandt, Himmler’s personal advisor (Strzelecka 1996), contacted Clauberg, asking on behalf of Himmler, [how long it would take] to sterilize 1000 Jewesses. The Jewesses themselves should not know anything about it. As the SS Reich Leader [Himmler] understands it, you could give the appropriate injection during a general examination.

Needless to say, giving untested, unknown vaccines to people forced to take them (whether by a proclaimed "emergency," by a "public health" order by the WHO, or by whatever justification) or tricked into taking them by the use of frightening or false information is a "medical experiment" and one that violates the core principles of the Nuremberg - informed and unambiguous consent.

Needless to say, giving untested, unknown vaccines is a "medical experiment"and violates the core principles of the Nuremberg - informed and unambiguous consent. Forcing people to take vaccines, whether by a proclaimed "emergency," by a "public health" order from the WHO, or by threat of loss of rights over one's children or of imprisonment, removes consent, as does giving vaccines to those unable by age or mental status to legally consent. "Informed," as well, is hollowed of all meaning when people are tricked into taking vaccines by the use of false or frightening "information."

In California, the pharmaceutical industry has just gotten legislators to pass a law that ends informed consent over vaccines. The vaccines involved are not just any vaccines but those involved in sexuality (and thus fertility). Jerry Brown signed it into law despite the appeal of parents in California and across the country and despite his having just previously signed into a law a bill preventing children under 18 being able to use tanning beds (see: California Tanning Bed Law Bans Underage Use - Huffington Post)

A California law removes the rights of parents to consent in having their minor children vaccinated and even their right to have knowledge they are being vaccinated. Instead, the law gives the state the right to "offer" vaccines (even those not yet invented for that purpose) for sexually transmitted diseases to children as young as 12 years old, and prior to being offered the vaccines, the children are exposed to movies of people dying from cancer. (see: The Canary Party: California 12 Year Olds to be Vaccinated with out Parental Knowledge -

Gardasil and Hepatitis B vaccine are two vaccines that 12 year old children may now "consent" to. Both are Merck products.

"Records show the Merck pharmaceutical company received a major share of the Nazi "flight capital" at the close of World War II when its president, George W. Merck, was America's biological weapons industry director. These facts were revealed by Norman Covert, Army public relations director at Fort Detrick in Frederick, MD, and veteran news correspondent Paul Manning in his book "Martin Bormann: Nazi in Exile" (Lyle Stuart, Inc, 1981)." (see: Nazi connections to Allopathy)

For Jewish families who lost sons because of AIDS, it may be of interest that the vaccine chief at Merck, Dr. Maurice Hillerman, admitted that Merck's Hepatitis B vaccine caused the AIDS epidemic in the US because the vaccines were contaminated with a monkey virus. (He also said that all Merck's vaccines are contaminated with cancer and other viruses.) "This stunning censored interview conducted by medical historian Edward Shorter for WGBH public television (Boston) and Blackwell Science was cut from The Health Century due to its huge liability–the admission that Merck drug company vaccines have traditionally been injecting cancer viruses (SV40 and others) in people worldwide."

The US government has itself conceded that the HEP B vaccine causes Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. (see: US Government Concedes Hep B Vaccine Causes Systemic Lupus Erythematosus)

The Hepatitis B vaccine *is linked to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and a three-fold increased risk of Multiple Sclerosis and yet is *mandated on the first day of birth to all US infants (see: Warning to Parents: This Vaccine Linked to Sudden Infant Death… - and Hepatitis B Vaccine May Be Linked to MS - Web MD Health News) and Refuse This Routine Procedure - Or Expose Your Baby's Brain to Severe Danger... -

As Dr. Jane Orient of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) so eloquently testified to Congress:

*"For most children, the risk of a serious vaccine reaction may be 100 times greater than the risk of hepatitis B."* (see: Hepatitis B Vaccine -

In addition to Hepatitis B's already disturbing history of AIDS, and its connection to LUPUS and MS, the Hepatitis B vaccines contains - *as do all the new vaccines -* an ingredient called polysorbate 80 which is the central ingredient in a patent on "A Fertility Impairing Vaccine, the patent makes it apparent that the intent to impair fertility is sought, is not accidental, and the pharmaceutical industry expects to profit from causing that effect." (see: Polysorbate 80 In Swine Flu Vaccines = Infertility In Humans - Organic Health)

Gardasil is the other vaccine being pushed in California and from which their new law has removed Nuremberg Code protection. Gardasil has it own problems (see: Gardasil Researcher Speaks Out - CBS News)

"If we vaccinate 11 year olds and the protection doesn't last... we've put them at harm from side effects, small but real, for no benefit," says Dr. Harper.

"The benefit to public health is nothing, there is no reduction in cervical cancers, they are just postponed, unless the protection lasts for at least 15 years, and over 70% of all sexually active females of all ages are vaccinated."

She also says that enough serious side effects have been reported after Gardasil use that the vaccine could prove riskier than the cervical cancer it purports to prevent. Cervical cancer is usually entirely curable when detected early through normal Pap screenings.

Dr. Scott Ratner and his wife, who's also a physician, expressed similar concerns as Dr. Harper in an interview with CBS News last year. (see: Serious Questions About HPV Vaccine - CBS News)

One of their teenage daughters became severely ill after her first dose of Gardasil. Dr. Ratner says she'd have been better off getting cervical cancer than the vaccination. "My daughter went from a varsity lacrosse player at Choate to a chronically ill, steroid-dependent patient with autoimmune myofasciitis. I've had to ask myself why I let my eldest of three daughters get an unproven vaccine against a few strains of a nonlethal virus that can be dealt with in more effective ways."

Gardasil reaction statistics for U.S. (see: DEATH BY VACCINATION -

Data is current up to AUG 12, 2011:

  • Disabled 763
  • Deaths 103
  • Did Not Recover 4777
  • Abnorm. Pap Smear 430
  • Cervical Dysplasia 157
  • Cervical Cancer 41
  • Life Threatening 444
  • Emergency Rm. Visit 9115
  • Hospitalized 2307
  • Extended Hosp. Stay 201
  • Serious 3111
  • Adverse Events 23388

In addition to it containing polysorbate 80, having killed more than 100 girls in the US (it was suspended in India after 4 girls died) and damaged many more, Gardasil is contaminated with genetically engineered HPV DNA. (see: In 6 countries, Merck’s Gardisil contaminated with genetically engineered viral HPV - Coto Report)

Merck's drug Vioxx killed 1000's (see: Report: Vioxx linked to thousands of deaths - MSNBC)

The basis for many of the Vioxx lawsuits is that Merck withheld information that clearly showed the dangers of the drug and the FDA was aware.

The Gardasil vaccine is Merck's biggest product since Vioxx. It is backing its marketing with attempted mandates moving on to funding of presidential candidates who support mandates, and to sly removal of human rights and the Nuremberg Code in California. (see: Texas governor orders STD vaccine for all girls - MSNBC and Texas governor orders STD vaccine for all girls - CNN)

This is basic information on Hepatitis B and Gardasil, which is unlikely to be given to 12 year old children for them to decide whether to take the vaccines.

The California law does something much more serious than removing informed consent. It has pre-approved the injection of *any*not-yet-even-in-existence, never-tested, contents--entirely unknown vaccines which purport to be aimed at sexually transmitted diseases. It has written a blank check.

End Israel's Unwarranted Murder of Kids

More Americans died in WWI from illness than combat. Photo shot this week in France
by's Q Madp who is touring U.S. military cemeteries in Europe.

This is the same industry that has kept the truth of their involvement in 1918 deaths from the public for almost a century. (see: Bayer and Death: Aspirin Killed, Homeopathy Saved - Food Freedom)

Through their long-standing connection to the Bushes, the pharmaceutical industry got pandemic laws put in place (using fear of a non-existent pandemic that would force unknown, untested vaccines on the entire population or they would face prison. (see: The GW Bush Gang - and The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA) and Bayer and Death: Vaccines and CDC’s Myth of a 1918 Virus - Food Freedom)

Henry Kissinger, long after the war, wrote a report promoting vaccines to the US government as a means of covert sterilization of populations. (see: A Universal Declaration of Resistance to mandatory Vaccinations -

*National Security Council Document 20506: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests

This 1974 memorandum drafted by Henry Kissinger led directly to the unleashing of experimental vaccines on the unsuspecting public. It sighted countries as targets for "initial population reduction experimentation to be implemented around the year 2000". They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia & Columbia for study. 3 million Filipinos ages 12-48 were given a test vaccine that ruined their health. North American Black Native American Women were each given the same vaccine resulting in sterility rates of 25% & 35% respectively. The directive came from the WHO

The directive came from the WHO and was directly tied to Kissinger's report. (see: Henry Kissinger & Population - and Henry Kissinger & Population -

Rabbis are brilliant at parsing the intricacies of the Torah and drawing moral and life lessons. They are certainly capable of drawing lessons from Auschwitz as well, lessons that honor life and protect the future.

  • The Nazis were working on developing vaccines to sterilize populations.
  • Jewish women died in those "experiments."
  • The Nuremberg Code was the ethical and moral response to their horrific deaths, considered crimes against humanity.

According to Mattias Rath, the German Jewish cardiologist (renowned for discovering animals do not die from heart attacks or strokes because they make their own vitamin C), the Pharmaceutical Industry was responsible for WWII the camps and are 20 times larger today. (see: The History of the "Business With Disease")

  • Merck received much of Hitler's flight capital.
  • Merck developed the Hepatitis B which their own vaccine chief said caused AIDS in the US and is loaded with cancer and other viruses.
  • The same industry that sought eugenics and sterilization, and went to prison for crimes against humanity, now seeks population reduction.
(see: Bill Gates talks about ‘vaccines to reduce population)

The same industry that put Hitler into office are producing the vaccines, which all contain an ingredient to impair fertility.

Those vaccines are being mandated to all US children on the day of and yet all liability has been removed.

Pharma has dismantled the Nuremberg Code.

From Nurses and the sterilization experiments of Auschwitz: a postmodernist perspective:

"The experiments conducted in block 10 were carried out with the greatest secrecy (Minney 1966). The goal was to sterilize as many women as possible in a short period of time, without their knowledge, and without requiring any recovery time." The experiments continued despite numerous deaths (Pleskoff 1956).

Less than 100 of the more than 1000 inmates subjected to the sterilization experiments of Clauberg [vaccines] and Schumann [irradiation] survived (Strzelecka 2000). The rest died of complications or were murdered by lethal injection or in the gas chambers (Strzelecka 2000). Some of these >>> were as young as 14 years at the time (Kubica 2002).

Foucault (1979, 140) utilized the term ‘bio-power’ to express the exercise of technology to achieve subjugation.  .... Agamben asserts that the ethics that remains ‘after Auschwitz’ is an ethics of testimony, and the fundamental task of such an ethics is to bear witness. At the heart of this new ethics is the testimony of suffering that reflects the Nazi attempt to reduce the human to a mere biological substance, a degree of degradation that erases meaningful distinctions between human and non-human, life and death, ethics and physiology.

To what extent can such a code be effective in preventing another morally collapsed universe such as Auschwitz?

Jewish women, whose agony and deaths from 'sterilizing vaccine' experiments, contributed to the creation of the Nuremberg Code. Are they forgotten now even by rabbis?

And why are Jewish religious leaders silent?

One of the most crucial human rights codes in history, one that arose because of the Holocaust, is being removed and by the same industry that caused the Holocaust.

Where is Rabbi David Saperstein of the Religious Action Committee of the Reform Jewish Movement?  Where is Rabbi Michael Lerner of Tikkun?  Where is Rabbi Ari Weiss of *Uri* L'Tzedek, a social justice movement of the Orthodox community? Or *Rabbi Brian Walt? Where are the Rabbis who speak of "Never again" yet are oblivious as the same companies which ran the camps are putting in place laws to remove the Nuremberg Code, protection from them?  *Where are the women rabbis across the US, to speak up on behalf of the women who suffered and died in forced experiments to develop vaccines to sterilize whole populations?

Special thanks to

Comments Leave a comment on this story.

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

Anonymous February 10, 2013 5:39 pm (Pacific time)

"It was the Rothchild zionists who caused all the atrocities and are still doing it today. " I'm not even sure you could honestly call the Rothscilds and the rest of the Cabal, who though they BEGAN as Jewish families, they were NOT Hebrews as I understand it, and are NOT Zionists - they are simply USING Israel and their rabid hatred of Arabs as well as a willingness, apparently, to assassinate anyone. Supposedly the two "dancing cameramen" on 9-11 were found to be Mossad, and this is why they were released even when they claimed, "We're here to document the incident", referring to the 9-11 incident. They KNEW about it, they EXPECTED IT. There are many other false-flag incidents attributed the use of Mossad agents. Women, pregnant women, children - it doesn't matter who the target is. This callous treatment of anyone at all, especially the Palestinians, is part of why Jews all over the world repudiate Israel and will have nothing to do with it. The Zionists are vicious murderers, period. Many ex-Israeli military absolutely LOATHE how they were used and what they did, and many young Israelis refuse to serve because of those policies. Lastly, the "bloodline families" like Rothschilds, Rockefekkers, et al, whatever their origins, are not Jews now - they claim to be Luciferians, and the witnesses of THOSE atrocities are many, their stories sickening. Those people are psychopaths, sociopaths especially, all of them! Ian Ian

S July 10, 2012 12:08 pm (Pacific time)

Wow, the author of this article is on par with holocaust deniers. Vaccines and science have as much to do with Auschwitz and the false vaccine claims as this author has to do with logic and astro physics. Shame on Salem news for letting a complete moron write on their pages!

Editor: That is not a fair assessment.

Anonymous001 November 8, 2011 5:17 am (Pacific time)

Ralph, I am far from anti-Semitic and was honestly asking a question and seeking a response. If you can only see what you want to see, then I shall no longer attempt discourse. Thank you. I was hoping to be informed, not attacked.

Ralph E. Stone November 7, 2011 5:08 pm (Pacific time)

Anonymous, you have to be kidding. I now see the roots of your anti-semitic nonsense.

Anonymous001 November 7, 2011 3:27 pm (Pacific time)

Ralph, could you share when and where the Protocols was determined to be false? I heard somewhere that there was only some similarity (not a complete copy) between the Protocols and the Dialogue, and that the writers of the Protocols has only used the latter as a reference. But I am only aware of a Swiss court of appeals decision, circa 1935, that found the document to NOT be a hoax. I further thought that I read something that indicated the entire substance of the issue (other than the above) was based on three articles in the Times of London during the effort for the Zionists to take over Palestine and when the Times was acquired by a jewish financier. Please inform.

Ralph E. Stone November 7, 2011 7:27 am (Pacific time)

I am often a critic of Israel's policies, especially its treatment of the Palestinians. However, criticizing Israel is not necessarily anti-semitism. Mr. or Mrs. Anonymous' comments strike me as blatantly anit-semititic. Remember, The Protocols of Zion, as they were commonly called, which were widely translated and reprinted. They generally promote a conspiracy theory that the Jews had a program to take over the world. They appeared in numerous Russian publications for the next 14 years, and then arose in the west. Britain, the United States, and Germany began publishing them around 1920, and they've been available in print somewhere ever since. Today they are still published throughout the Middle East, in Venezuela, in Malaysia, and Indonesia; most often in Muslim countries.

The first Western publication is believed to have been in the Times of London on May 8, 1920, under the headline "The Jewish Peril". The Protocols of Zion was a nearly exact copy of an 1864 book by Maurice Joly called The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu. Joly, a conservative French lawyer, wrote it as a satirical account of how Napoleon III was planning to take over the world. Large sections of it were plagiarized word-for-word in the original French, literally replacing the word "French" with "the world" and replacing "Napoleon III" with "Jews". As Joly's book was (and still is) available for anyone to examine, this revelation established conclusively that The Protocols of Zion were a hoax.

Anonymous must have read a copy of The Protocols of Zion or is parroting its anti-semitic nonsense. I noted some of the same anti-semitic nonsense in some of the comments to my article, Visiting Auschwitz. These comments have no place in Salem News.

Anonymous November 7, 2011 4:42 am (Pacific time)

I appreciate the author speaking of the atrocities and how they persist even today in the U.S., but the history is tainted. It was the Rothchild zionists who caused all the atrocities and are still doing it today. Where do you think hitler got all his ideas from?

[Return to Top]
©2022 All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of

Articles for November 6, 2011 | Articles for November 7, 2011 | Articles for November 8, 2011
Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar

Your customers are looking: Advertise on!


Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin

Use PayPal to