New York Judge Admits to Medical Marijuana Use and Endorses Legalization

Salem-News.com Marijuana Coverage

Where and How to Smoke Legal Marijuana without Fear of Arrest in the U.S.

Eulogy of a Great Warrior: Hoss Plourde

The Ripple Effect How Marijuana Laws Are Impacting Society

Audit the Audit

Welcome Home, Tom

Mexico has a problem caused by the demand for marijuana and other illegal drugs. Over 50,000 persons have been killed by the drug cartels. The American judiciary is responsible for this. Judicial review of criminal laws by rational basis is deprivation of rights under the color of law. The following marijuana question, that a every defendant should ask in court, has been placed on the docket of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) on a petition for Writ Of Certiorari. “Whether the proscription of marijuana is unreasonable and unnecessary police regulation of Petitioner Dee’s fundamental rights to privacy, to liberty and to property and contravenes the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States?” http://www.s234950599.onlinehome.us/8.html Docketed as No. 11-1354, the State of Maine has declared to the court it will not file a brief in opposition to my petition to SCOTUS. Rule 15. http://www.supremecourt.gov/ SCOTUS’ decision to review and answer this question could be decided by the end of June. Michael J Dee www.ursm.us Windham , Maine 207-893-0287 Judge’s Plea Should be for Liberty, Property and Privacy New York Supreme Court justice Gustin L. Reichbach is going to the legislature for medical marijuana. He claims it is a fundamental human and medical right to use marijuana. The courts have declared marijuana is not a fundamental right. Judicial review of these criminal laws has been rational basis, a political question. It appears this justice does not recognize liberty, property and privacy are basic fundamental human rights. He does not recognize being arrested is deprivation of liberty. Seizing marijuana is deprivation of property. A search warrant is an invasion of privacy. He claims marijuana does not have “deleterious side affects [but] remains classified as a narcotic with no medicinal use.” If he researched the federal law, he would see what determines medicinal use is safety of use. He would then realize marijuana is arbitrarily classified as a controlled substance and violates due process of law. The justice said, “Criminalizing an effective medical technique affects the fair administration of justice” He has failed to recognize criminal laws are to be reasonable and necessary to protect the rights of other. To be a crime there has to be a victim. Until he or any defendant raises this claim in court, Hon. Gustin L. Reichbach has the authority to declare to the legislature the proscription of marijuana to be unreasonable and unnecessary police regulation of his fundamental rights to privacy, to liberty and to property and contravenes the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. But is there really three branches of government establish by the social contract, the Constitution of the United States in the war on drugs? Guess not. Michael J Dee www.ursm.us Windham , Maine 207-893-0287

Judge’s Plea Should be for Liberty, Property and Privacy New York Supreme Court justice Gustin L. Reichbach is going to the legislature for medical marijuana. He claims it is a fundamental human and medical right to use marijuana. The courts have declared marijuana is not a fundamental right. Judicial review of these criminal laws has been rational basis, a political question. It appears this justice does not recognize liberty, property and privacy are basic fundamental human rights. He does not recognize being arrested is deprivation of liberty. Seizing marijuana is deprivation of property. A search warrant is an invasion of privacy. He claims marijuana does not have “deleterious side affects [but] remains classified as a narcotic with no medicinal use.” If he researched the federal law, he would see what determines medicinal use is safety of use. He would then realize marijuana is arbitrarily classified as a controlled substance and violates due process of law. The justice said, “Criminalizing an effective medical technique affects the fair administration of justice” He has failed to recognize criminal laws are to be reasonable and necessary to protect the rights of other. To be a crime there has to be a victim. Until he or any defendant raises this claim in court, Hon. Gustin L. Reichbach has the authority to declare to the legislature the proscription of marijuana to be unreasonable and unnecessary police regulation of his fundamental rights to privacy, to liberty and to property and contravenes the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. But is there really three branches of government establish by the social contract, the Constitution of the United States in the war on drugs? Guess not. Michael J Dee www.ursm.us Windham , Maine 207-893-0287